Look despite your inadvertent hilarity, I do sympathize. I will explain when I have time, unless someone helps you out before that.
Until then, I recommend considering the nature of Wikipedia, and looking into why on this board the site is often referred to as "the Armenian Genocide," or "the Polish Cabal."
Really? Seriously?
Oh, i get it. It's about being able to discredit the best and most accessible tool for learning history that non-specialists have. I guess the same happens to any kind of history popularization magazine. Right.
I don't get historians, really. In science we love the wikipedia. You can become a self taught expert in many scientific fields if you bother to study the corresponding wikipedia articles and dig deep enough... because scientists love writing articles and correcting others' articles.
No, i get that history isn't an objective discipline and it's open to interpretation in most cases (unlike science, where the open interpretation is limited to very few cases). But it isn't that hard to reflect in the wiki articles the main interpretations, according to the articles in peer reviewed journals. All the edit wars i've seen in history articles in the wiki were about one person removing the interpretation of another person, and viceversa, rarely about giving both interpretations.
The article(s) about the Armenian genocide are sufficiently documented and referenced to satisfy me. And seriously, there's enough scholarly literature on the topic...
More on concrete matters, what is that "over a long period of time for the sake of political expediency". It took place during 3 years, that's a lot shorter than the Holocaust. And the genocide is an act, not an end. The nazis claimed to have a good purpose in mind for killing all the jews.
Then again, i learned about these things in the Wiki, so i guess my opinions, with that source, are worthless. So, sorry for wasting your time.