This is in the Indian Ocean, between Mozambique and Madagascar, so... probably not.Is this one of the White Raja states?
This is in the Indian Ocean, between Mozambique and Madagascar, so... probably not.Is this one of the White Raja states?
The Druze should definitely have religious autonomy, if they don't already.We are not limiting it to Abrahamic, I'm still working with India but if you know some religious areas that would speed things up.
Adding to this, Mongolia (or part of it at least) could be under the control of the Bogd Khan/Jebtsundamba Khutuktu.There aught to be a bit of Tibet that's just under the control of the Dalai and/or Panchen Lama.
I know of a map of Mongolian monastic estates during the Qing Dynasty, perhaps we can use that. By that extension, though.... the independent estates in Kham and Tibet will be a real doozy to organize through.Adding to this, Mongolia (or part of it at least) could be under the control of the Bogd Khan/Jebtsundamba Khutuktu.
@TheBeanieBaron do you have any ideas when Portugal became a Federal Kingdom? I think only colonies established by that time should be considered Portuguese.
Just to confirm - are the Allied Kingdoms just monarchies that are considered to have "imperial immediacy". I.e. that they are vassals of the King-Emperor-Caesar-Maharajah-Tianzi-Padishah-Sultan-etc., but not of any specific crown within the worldraj?
will doThe Druze should definitely have religious autonomy, if they don't already.
they doDoes Mount Athos have religious autonomy. IMO they should, if they don't already have it.
working on itThere aught to be a bit of Tibet that's just under the control of the Dalai and/or Panchen Lama.
gooooood questionAre there any Bogomils still around in Bosnia? In which case, maybe one of the Bosnian vassals should have religious autonomy.
probably unlikelyMaybe there's at least one or more Muslim(-majority) state still in Spain? Granada and/or Cordoba?
interestingThe Kalmyks (who are Buddhist) already have autonomy under a tribal arrangement. Those sorts of agreements probably include clauses to allow for religious autonomy as well.
agreedI think they should only be listed if their autonomy is granted primarily, if not exclusively on a religious basis, but they otherwise have the "normal" level of self-governance for that kind of subdivision.
you're right, I might isolate Angkor Wat.In regards to Cambodia, I am also of the opinion that it is odd that they have religious autonomy, and not just a "vassal kingdom" autonomy, in which the locals are free to follow whatever religion they like. Unless Cambodia is a directly-ruled colony, or something like that?
The other alternative is the marriage of Charles II to Katherine of Braganza, which is why I asked, might be something in @Alex Richards existing lore.Hmm, Around the time of the Iberian Union? I think Castile would have already come to union with England by that time.
agreedI think they are de jure independent but satellite states.
Was a reference to the previous idea to have White Raja states in Asia and Africa, did not think White Raja of the Comoros was a real thing.....This is in the Indian Ocean, between Mozambique and Madagascar, so... probably not.
In which case, at the very least Portugal should have its own colonies, in some kind of sub-raj system.agreed
I’m thinking sometime in the 18th or 19th century.@TheBeanieBaron do you have any ideas when Portugal became a Federal Kingdom? I think only colonies established by that time should be considered Portuguese.
Going back to this to discuss the trajectory of Christianity some more, particularly the existence of groups like the Amish.As for Pennsylvania - that's Amish country, so I just went with that.
Florida can have the same government as Acadia.For Florida, I admit that I didn't have anything in particular in mind. I am more than happy to change it for the next version.
Maybe this timeline’s version of the Thirty Years War can result in a Catholic victory, forcing many Protestants to immigrate outside of Europe.Going back to this to discuss the trajectory of Christianity some more, particularly the existence of groups like the Amish.
An idea I had was that while most of what we recognize as the Protestant Reformation doesn't happen or is contained within the Church (i.e. Martin Luther remains in the Church and potentially occupies a similar role to OTL's St. Ignatius of Loyola [the founder of the Jesuits], while John Calvin may be more moderate and create a group within the Church occupying a similar niche to OTL Jansenism), there could still be something like the Radical Reformation creating groups that splinter off from the Church. So while most of OTL's magisterial/liturgical Protestantism remains Catholic, there is still a more radical movement that leads to the creation of Protestantism, albeit being much weaker due to lacking the institutional support of the OTL Reformation and being much more radical politically and theologically. By the time of the map they may have mostly been pushed out of Europe, but some colonies in the Americas may still have these groups, like the Amish country already on the map and potentially other locations like Plymouth.
I will implement this if others agree.Florida can have the same government as Acadia.
I'm not sure how that's possible if Bohemia was gained via the Palatinate.Maybe this timeline’s version of the Thirty Years War can result in a Catholic victory, forcing many Protestants to immigrate outside of Europe.
Oh, maybe the removal of Protestants from Europe is a more drawn out process then.I'm not sure how that's possible if Bohemia was gained via the Palatinate.
Maybe it's more of a case of non-mainstream Protestants fleeing Europe.Oh, maybe the removal of Protestants from Europe is a more drawn out process then.
Oh, maybe the removal of Protestants from Europe is a more drawn out process then.
Like I said, my thinking is that Protestantism is much weaker ITTL than in actual history, with TTL's Reformation being what we know as the Radical Reformation, while the elements/figures that formed the OTL Magisterial Reformation (Lutheranism, Calvinism, and Anglicanism) stay within the Catholic Church. Perhaps the Church cracks down more on practices like the sale of indulgences, and families like the Borgias and Medicis don't take control of the Papacy, leading to a Church that's more willing to address grievances and hold an earlier Council of Trent equivalent reforming the practices of the Church. Despite this, there are still those who are opposed to the Church (and these feelings are probably tied to opposition against the monarchy), which leads to what we'd recognize as the Radical Reformation, with this producing groups like the Anabaptists. Because it's only these more radical groups that split from the Catholic Church, and they don't have nearly as much institutional support as the OTL Magisterial Reformation, they're pretty easily defeated, although a few groups are able to successfully establish themselves in colonies in the New World and survive to the present.Maybe it's more of a case of non-mainstream Protestants fleeing Europe.
Rather like otl then, it is said the Pilgrim Fathers went to America not to escape persecution but because THEY were not allowed to persecute those they saw as heretics.Maybe it's more of a case of non-mainstream Protestants fleeing Europe.