Without invasion of Soviet Union how long would the war in Europe have lasted in WW2??

Without invasion of Soviet Union how long would the war in Europe have lasted?

POD: for some reason the invasion of Soviet Union by Germany in ww2 does not happen at any time
 
ASB. Nazi ideology revolved around a need for Lebensraum in the East and conflict with what they called Judeo-Bolshevism. The Soviet-Nazi treaties were only ever ones of convenience, war between the USSR and Nazi Germany is inevitable.
 

colonel

Donor
It depends. Does Hitler still declare war on the US after Pearl Harbor? Does Stalin turn around and attack Germany? If the answer to both is no, the US likely concentrates on Japan, and there may actually be a negotiated settlement in Europe. If either answer is yes, the war may be longer or shorter but the outcome won’t change significantly.
 
It depends. Does Hitler still declare war on the US after Pearl Harbor? Does Stalin turn around and attack Germany? If the answer to both is no, the US likely concentrates on Japan, and there may actually be a negotiated settlement in Europe. If either answer is yes, the war may be longer or shorter but the outcome won’t change significantly.
Hitler could delay American entry into the war in Europe by not declaring war on the USA, but the battle of the Atlantic would eventually bring it about.
 
Assuming the Soviets don't invade, even well after their military is much stronger than the Wehrmacht? 1946 if the Manhattan Project still happens, otherwise it's already ended.
 
Till 1945/46. Or for a more interesting answer then "Till silverplate is ready for active deployment", till the Nazi Economy implodes under the strain, so 1950 at the absolute most.
 

CalBear

Moderator
Donor
Monthly Donor
Didn’t you literally write a timeline where the WAllies smashed a Nazi Germany who was totally ascendant over the Continent?
I did.

However, in that case the Nazis had invaded and defeated the USSR and had, as IOTL, decladed War on the U.S. In May of 1941 the Reich owned the European Continent, except for Bomber Command's raids. While it would require Hitler to drop dead (ideally somewhere around November of 1940 as this would circumvent the Reich getting involved in the Med, since none of possible successors, especially Goring, were likely to sent off German legions to bail Mussolini out). So no Greece, no Crete, no Western Desert, no massive diversion of resources for no good reason. When you look at total Wehrmacht losses in the Med Theater they are absolutely appalling, especially in aircraft, guns, and vehicles.

It is not difficult to construct a scenario where the Reich shift gears and construction priorities and simply builds enough night fighters to destroy Bomber Command early on if there is no emphasis on getting ready to go after the USSR (Harris didn't assume command of the Bomber force until 1942, and the early raids by the British were pinpricks, the first "large raid" was by 96 aircraft in mid May of 1940), leaving the British with nothing to fight against except U-Boats. Alternatively the War winds up with competing air raids, even after the Americans enter the War. Without the Reich burning up manpower and equipment in the East it is going to be VASTLY more difficult to destroy the Luftwaffe. Th is is sort of the opposite argument to the one which is usually put forward when who effective the CBO was; now the thousands of 8.8cm AAA guns and fighters sent East are available to increase the defenses over the Reich.

Germany had won the war by December of 1940. Problem was Hitler had barely started his.
 

thaddeus

Donor
However, in that case the Nazis had invaded and defeated the USSR and had, as IOTL, decladed War on the U.S. In May of 1941 the Reich owned the European Continent, except for Bomber Command's raids. While it would require Hitler to drop dead (ideally somewhere around November of 1940 as this would circumvent the Reich getting involved in the Med, since none of possible successors, especially Goring, were likely to sent off German legions to bail Mussolini out). So no Greece, no Crete, no Western Desert, no massive diversion of resources for no good reason. When you look at total Wehrmacht losses in the Med Theater they are absolutely appalling, especially in aircraft, guns, and vehicles.

Germany had won the war by December of 1940. Problem was Hitler had barely started his.
how do they get off the "Japan crazy train?" get highly offended by the Japanese "intrusion" into Indochina in Sept.'40? (as they were trying to keep the French colonial holdings intact)

just IMO, the best possible scenario for Germany would have been some agreement with the Vichy regime and renewed relations with KMT China? (the economics certainly favor that over a relationship with Japan)
 

raharris1973

Gone Fishin'
how do they get off the "Japan crazy train?" get highly offended by the Japanese "intrusion" into Indochina in Sept.'40? (as they were trying to keep the French colonial holdings intact)

just IMO, the best possible scenario for Germany would have been some agreement with the Vichy regime and renewed relations with KMT China? (the economics certainly favor that over a relationship with Japan)
Did KMT China still even hold the more economically valuable parts of China at this time, or did Japan occupy those parts?
 
‘44 if Anglo-American political will gives out. Late-‘45 if it doesn’t and the atomic bomb convinces German generals to act. ~‘47 if neither of the above pans out.
 
‘44 if Anglo-American political will gives out. Late-‘45 if it doesn’t and the atomic bomb convinces German generals to act. ~‘47 if neither of the above pans out.
Why would the German military leadership break their oaths to Hitler and overthrow the Nazi government because of the atomic bombs when these were the same officers that IOTL continued to fight for Hitler even after millions of enemy troops were on German soil, millions of Germans were either starving or refugees, numerous towns and cities were destroyed or firebombed and hundreds of thousands of German soldiers were dying every single month (over 1.2 million German troops died in the last 5 months of the OTL war)?
 

thaddeus

Donor
how do they get off the "Japan crazy train?" get highly offended by the Japanese "intrusion" into Indochina in Sept.'40? (as they were trying to keep the French colonial holdings intact)

just IMO, the best possible scenario for Germany would have been some agreement with the Vichy regime and renewed relations with KMT China? (the economics certainly favor that over a relationship with Japan)

Did KMT China still even hold the more economically valuable parts of China at this time, or did Japan occupy those parts?
good observation, the tungsten would seemingly be out of Japanese reach (?) http://www.chinatungsten.com/mapc.h...onally been the,remains at about 70% capacity. judging by a handy wiki map https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Sino-Japanese_War#/media/File:Dadao_map_1939.svg

however my overall point was the potential trade with Japan never materialized (AFAIK), and under this scenario no invasion of the USSR is happening, so the military usefulness of Japan against the Soviets at least is unneeded?
 
Why would the German military leadership break their oaths to Hitler and overthrow the Nazi government because of the atomic bombs when these were the same officers that IOTL continued to fight for Hitler even after millions of enemy troops were on German soil, millions of Germans were either starving or refugees, numerous towns and cities were destroyed or firebombed and hundreds of thousands of German soldiers were dying every single month (over 1.2 million German troops died in the last 5 months of the OTL war)?
Hey, I never suggested the shock would be enough for that. Merely that it might.
 

CalBear

Moderator
Donor
Monthly Donor
how do they get off the "Japan crazy train?" get highly offended by the Japanese "intrusion" into Indochina in Sept.'40? (as they were trying to keep the French colonial holdings intact)

just IMO, the best possible scenario for Germany would have been some agreement with the Vichy regime and renewed relations with KMT China? (the economics certainly favor that over a relationship with Japan)
I am assuming you mean the Reich? That was very simple. The Tripartite Pact was, at best, a purely defensive alliance aimed specifically at the United States. The Reich had absolutely no obligation to go to war against the U.S. following Pearl Harbor.

Some members here would argue that it was Hitler's most serious unforced error (I come down somewhat on the other side, mainly because once the British became co-belligerents with the U.S. against Japan, the U.S. could use that as an excuse to ship pretty much anything and everything to the UK, assuming the UK "pledged" not to use it against the Reich).
I agree but what do you say about the idea that the atomic bombs would somehow be a magic bullet against Nazi Germany despite control of the continent and an abundance of resources due to no Barbarossa?
As I've argued in many other threads - First Generation nuclear weapons were not, on their own, war winning weapons. 20kT yield weapons are not the Wrath of an Angry God, "we must surrender instantly" game changers (2mT weapons? Even 500kT weapons? Whole different story)

Firstly, they required very unusual condition to even make their use possible, including virtually no serious opposition over the target or risk of interception en route. The Japanese had decide not to waste time, fuel, pilots, and aircraft to attack American reconnaissance/weather flights. They had reached the point that they saw a three B-29 formation as completely nonthreatening and with limited supplies of fuel and trained pilots it was better to save them for imminent invasion. Everyone "knew" that the bombers either came after dark or, rarely, came in huge numbers during the day with fighter escorts. At Hiroshima an air raid warning was given when radar first observed the approach of Tibbet's flight, the all clear was sounded once it was established that it was only the "regular" three plane recon flight.

The Reich never ceded the air to the WAllies. They sent up fighters and heavy AAA into last April of 1945 to defend whatever ground they had left. The bombing parameters for the early Special Weapons were very specific, and the flight envelope very tight. The bombing aircraft had to release, then go into an immediate 180° diving turn to increase speed lest the detonations shock wave swat the aircraft out of the sky. It was an impossible maneuver to make as a large, or even small, formation (over Hiroshima and Nagasaki both instrument aircraft broke away from the bombing aircraft to remain outside of the initial blast radius and allow the dropping bomber all the room it need to escape. Trying that over the Reich would have been close to suicide during the day, and not that much better at night (71% of all Bomber Command Lancaster were lost during the war, 55% of Bomber Command's personnel were KIA, that was despite almost exclusively bombing at night). It is likely that at least half, very possibly all, of early attacks would result in loss of the aircraft and "salvage detonations" when the armed weapon passed its preset triggering altitude.

Secondly (and probably much more importantly) why would even an entirely successful nuclear strike force the Reich to surrender in this scenario? There would be no Red Army rolling across Eastern Europe with Blood in its eye and Revenge in its Heart. It is very unlikely that th WAllies would even have a reasonable lodgement on the Continent. IOTL the Reich surrendered only after Berlin and pretty much every other city in the country had been occupied, Allied troops were wandering almist at will across nearly every inch of Germany, and the entire political leadership was either dead or running for their lives. Just weeks before the German eventual surrender the CBO had done a fair imitation of bombing a heretofore mainly undamaged city, Dresden, into the Stone Age. The Nazi's reaction was to make a propaganda story out of it. Otherwise the Party/national leadership didn't even blink. Could the Bomb have drive the Reich to Surrender? Maybe. In 1947.

One or two bombs a month wouldn't have done it. For one thing Germany would likely have already have had the pougies bombed out of it, you can only turn a city into masonry fragments once. After that all you are accomplishing is rearranging the rubble. You also need the Nazis to actually give a damn about the population. They didn't IOTL, in fact as the end closed in Hitler actually believed that if the Volk could win it didn't deserve to survive (fun guy, even for a fracking madman he was frackin' nuts).

People tend to forget that it wasn't just the use of two Special Weapons against Japan inside of three days that brought about the Surrender. It was also the entry of the USSR into the War (the Japanese had managed to convince themselves that they could get Stalin, of all people, to broker a negotiated end of the War with the WAllies) and the Red Army's virtually instant shattering of the Kwantung Army combined with the two Bombs and a wink/nudge exception on "Unconditional Surrender" that protected the Emperor that caused the Bitter Enders in the Government to blink just long enough to allow Hirohito to declare that things must end. Even then, with two nuked cities, with pretty much every city worth the title being burned out, with the Red Army simply obliterating what had been Japan's proudest Military formation, with WAllied warships conducting shore bombardments of Japanese coastal cities, with WAllied fighters attacking anything that moved on the roads, literally down to handcarts, with the entire Japanese navy on the bottom of the sea, and looking down the gunbarrel of the post potent Military Alliance the world had ever seen, the Surrender was almost prevented by a Coup. A couple senior Japanese Army officers say yes rather than no and the Surrender is stopped cold by some Majors and Colonels.
 
People forget that what worked on Emperor Hirohito won’t necessarily work on Hitler, Himmler, Bormann and Goebbels. The Reich only surrendered when a professional military officer was in charge (Doenitz) and millions of troops had already conquered most of German territory. IOTL Hitler willingly let cities get firebombed and sent children and old men to die in the rubble of Berlin rather than surrender, Himmler ordered that all males in any building displaying a white flag were to be shot and Goebbels killed himself and his own family because he didn’t want to live in a world without Nazism and his beloved Fuhrer.

The important question is would the WAllies have sufficient political will to defeat the Reich at the cost of an ocean of blood and treasure. WW1 demonstrated that defeating a continental power is a bloody and grueling task. I personally give it at least a 50% chance that the WAllies settle for peace in a scenario like this. Unlike in fairy tales good doesn’t always win over evil.
 
Last edited:
Top