Because Andranik was filibustering at this point. He had no authorization from the Armenian government.They obey batum treaty borders, but Armenians (like OTL) doesnt, there is still fightings in zengezur and karabakh.
Union with Azerbaijan would only be possible with German blessing because they have high stakes in the oil there. This doesn't address them unanimously annexing the entirety of Iranian Azerbaijan when they already have a clear connection from Kars to Baku.The Enver Pasha and CUP has Turkic dreams of reaching central asia. So annexing south azerbaijan would make much sense i think.
You're overestimating the strength of anti-Ottoman Arabism. Without the British propping it up they fall on deaf ears.But there wasnt too many options, either ottomans liberalise or would have more devastating consequences for both sides that could make empire collapse.
What federation? The federation would never be born in the first place. The Hungarians would veto it and the Dual Monarchy would continue with the status quo.Basically thats what happened. They didnt like Triple Monarchy or other autonomy-federation things and leaved the federation.
What if the Austrians vetoed Hungary's veto?The Hungarians would veto it and the Dual Monarchy would continue with the status quo.
I meant they leave the Austro-Hungarian empire and become fully independentWhat federation? The federation would never be born in the first place. The Hungarians would veto it and the Dual Monarchy would continue with the status quo
Would like to see a map of this pleasePastside of the Washtenaw Gate
Nice, just one thing that is bothering me. The Tunisian/Algerian border is incomplete.
is there a reason france owns literally all of africa except for the southernmost territory? this question also applies to india and the philippinesmore of my map done:
View attachment 818011
Britain after their civil war went full democratic which allowed France to keep Portugal in a corner, and did transfer subject on most countries' coloniesis there a reason france owns literally all of africa except for the southernmost territory? this question also applies to india and the philippines
...transfer subject? this isn't EU4, what does that even mean?Britain after their civil war went full democratic which allowed France to keep Portugal in a corner, and did transfer subject on most countries' colonies
They stole a lot of oversea colonies from other colonial powers, only the dutch kept some colonies overseas...transfer subject? this isn't EU4, what does that even mean?
also maintaining control of all of africa seems... very tenuous at best given they'd also have to think about occupying all of europe
i still don't think it's even remotely feasible that they could control an entire continent. that's,,, basically impossible for more than a few yearsThey stole a lot of oversea colonies from other colonial powers, only the dutch kept some colonies overseas