hey, all. some of you may be familiar with my English victory at Hastings thread, where part of the consensus ended up being that the alliance and eventual union between England, Ireland, and Scotland would be more mutually agreeable and less controversial had the Normans not conquered the isles
anyway, i was wondering recently what others thought about the notion of William Wallace as a loyalist to the English crown since there would (probably) not be any Scottish Wars of Independence ITTL. personally, i was wondering if he would fit best as a Scottish-English commander in an analogous war elsewhere in Europe, perhaps in Brittany (i decided a while ago that England would have control of this region for centuries due to butterflies) or if the fact that he's just a landowner IOTL would mean that he stays just that and doesn't have any kind of military career
anyway, i was wondering recently what others thought about the notion of William Wallace as a loyalist to the English crown since there would (probably) not be any Scottish Wars of Independence ITTL. personally, i was wondering if he would fit best as a Scottish-English commander in an analogous war elsewhere in Europe, perhaps in Brittany (i decided a while ago that England would have control of this region for centuries due to butterflies) or if the fact that he's just a landowner IOTL would mean that he stays just that and doesn't have any kind of military career