WI: Yaropolk I "Baptises the Rus" Rather than Vladmir

I have no idea if this is possible or not. @Valena @alexmilman @Rurik and others knowledgeable on Russian history.

Sviatoslav's successor, Yaropolk I (r. 972-980), seems to have had a more conciliatory attitude towards Christianity. Late medieval sources even claim that Yaropolk exchanged ambassadors with the Pope. The Chronicon of Adémar de Chabannes and the life of St. Romuald (by Pietro Damiani) actually document the mission of St. Bruno of Querfurt to the land of Rus', where he succeeded in converting to Christianity a local king (one of three brothers who ruled the land). Alexander Nazarenko suggests that Yaropolk went through some preliminary rites of baptism, but was murdered at the behest of his pagan half-brother Vladimir (whose own rights to the throne were questionable) before his conversion was formalized. Following this theory, any information on Yaropolk's baptism according to the Latin rite would be suppressed by the later Orthodox chroniclers, zealous to keep Vladimir's image of the Rus Apostle untarnished for succeeding generations

Say that Yaropolk had converted to the Latin rite (i.e. that his conversion had been formalized). Perhaps Vladimir is unsuccessful at murdering him, and is somehow killed/imprisoned instead. Since I have a shaky knowledge of medieval history at best, I have no idea if Yaropolk was "better" ruler than Vladimir, or that he would be able to achieve a baptism of the Rus in like manner (maybe one of his successors could get it right). But could Russia (or rather, what we now know as Russia) go Catholic? And what would be the effects of it doing so?
 
Yes, this option is quite real! I even simulated a similar development

Here is my version of the fork (in Russian and Google-English translation)
"Итак, Русь. на дворе стоит 978 год и приближается развязка борьбы за киевский престол. Владимир уже успел захватить Полоцк, убить Рогвалода и его сыновей, взять Рогнеду супротив её воли в жены, предварительно изнасиловав, и теперь его войско движется к Киеву... т.е. вроде бы все идет так, как в РИ... все, да не все

был у Ярополка такой воевода по имени Блуд (имя, скажем, так себе, но из песни слов не выкинешь)

и в нашей реальности он смог убедить Ярополка что в Киеве-де "ненадежно" и Ярополк по наущению сего воеводы сперва принял роковое для себя решение покинуть Киев и укрепится в крепости Родне на реке Рось, а зетем, по наущению все того же воеводы принял второе роковое решение, которое Ярополка и сгубило - о переговорах с Владимиром, в ходе которых Ярополка предательски убили, в результате чего 11 июня 978 года Владимир звхватил освободившийся киевский трон

в этой же реальности Ярополк слушать оного воеводу с неблагозвучным именем не стал, вместо этого решив остатся в столице.

Конечно Владимир осадил Киев, но осаждать столицу это далеко не одно и то-же, что осаждать небольшую крепость Родню. Короче - ход осады был для Владимира, прямо скажем, неудачным. Отчаявшись взять Киев измором, Владимир решается на попытку штурма города, в ходе которой он погибает. Ярополк победил, Владимир мёртв

перво наперво встаёт вопрос о том как быть с вотчиной покойного Владимира? - детей он оставить ЕЩЕ не успел, но в наличии есть к тому времени явно беременная Рогнеда, причем вполне понятно ОТ КОГО беременная. Учитывая, что Рогвалодовичи были верными союзниками Ярополка (за что собственно поплатились своими жизнями) то что Ярополк вернет Рогнеде принадлежавший её отцу Полоцк - тут можно даже не сомневаться. А вот с Новгородом вопрос по-интересней. Есть некислая вероятность что в этой реальности Изяславу Владимировичу, детерминистично родившемуся у Рогнеды под конец все того же 978 года, отойдет не только вотчина деда (Полоцк), но и вотчина папаши (Новгород) - вестимо что за пеленочника-Изяслава править соответствующими княжествами будет его мать Рогнеда

Сам же Ярополк тут доживет допустим до 1000 года. Предположим (автор мира имеет право устанавливать детали) что Святополк в этой рельности так и останется единственным сыном Ярополка (что не исключает рождения у него младших сестренок)

любопытно, что крещение Руси в этой реальности произойдет даже несколько раньше (ибо и в РИ Ярополк проявлял большой интерес и сочувствие к христианству), но с учетом того он имел тесные отношения с Оттоном II и Конрадом (будущим Швабским), то в этой реальности году этак примерно в 982 крещение Руси происходит по ЛАТИНСКОМУ обряду (Ярополк при крещении принимает имя, допустим, Марка)
"

translate
"So, Russia. in the yard is 978, and the end of the struggle for the Kiev throne is approaching. Vladimir has already managed to capture Polotsk, kill Rogvalod and his sons, take Rogneda against her will to marry, having previously raped, and now his army is moving towards Kiev ... i.e. everything seems to be going as in real ... everything, but not everything

Yaropolk had such a voivode Blud (the name, say, so-so, but you can't throw out the words from the song)

and in our reality he was able to convince Yaropolk that in Kiev de "unreliable" and Yaropolk at the instigation of this governor first made a fatal decision for himself to leave Kiev and strengthened himself in the fortress Rodna on the river Ros, and at the instigation of the same governor made the second the fatal decision that Yaropolk and murdered - about negotiations with Vladimir, during which Yaropolk was treacherously killed, as a result of which, on June 11, 978, Vladimir snatched the liberated Kiev throne

in the same reality, Yaropolk did not listen to this governor with an inarticulate name, instead deciding to stay in the capital.

Of course, Vladimir laid siege to Kiev, but besieging the capital is not the same as besieging a small fortress to Kin. In short - the course of the siege was for Vladimir, frankly, unsuccessful. Desperate to take Kiev to death, Vladimir decides to attempt to storm the city, during which he dies. Yaropolk won, Vladimir is dead

First and foremost, the question arises of how to deal with the deceased's fiefdom of Vladimir? - he did not have time to leave the children, but by that time there was obviously pregnant Rogneda, and it is quite understandable FROM who is pregnant. Considering that Rogvalodovichi were Yaropolk's faithful allies (for which they actually paid with their lives) that Yaropolk would return Rogneda to Polotsk, which belonged to her father, then there is no doubt about it. But with Novgorod the question is more interesting. There is a not acidic probability that in this reality Izyaslav Vladimirovich, who was born deterministically to Rogneda, towards the end of the same year 978, will lose not only the patrimony of his grandfather (Polotsk), but also the patrimony of his father (Novgorod) - it will be said that Izyaslav changing room will rule his respective principalities Rogned's mother

Yaropolk himself will live here until the year 1000. Suppose (the author of the world has the right to establish details) that Svyatopolk in this respect will remain the only son of Yaropolk (which does not exclude the birth of his younger sisters)

It is curious that the baptism of Russia in this reality will occur even a little earlier (for Yaropolk showed great interest and sympathy for Christianity in RI), but considering that he had close relations with Otton II and Conrad (the future Swabian), then in this reality approximately at 982, the baptism of Rus takes place according to the LATIN rite (Yaropolk accepts the name at the baptism, for example, Mark)
"
 
Yaropolk had such a voivode Blud (the name, say, so-so, but you can't throw out the words from the song)
Correction of possibile unclarity - "blud" means "adultery" in Russian, so this is a punny name, but it is not the point of TL.
 
Top