WI: Vijayanagara wins the battle of Talikota

During the first part of the battle the combined forces of the Deccan Sultanates were smashed by Vijayanagara and lost several thousand men, forcing the Sultans to revise their strategy. Adil Shah sent a fake letter to the Vijayanagaran commander that he was neutral, causing him to delay his attack which allowed the Muslim forces to regroup. Assuming the commander doesn't delay the attack and decisively defeats the combined Muslim forces before they have a chance to regroup, preventing the later mutinies by Muslim commanders should the battle have dragged on as it did IOTL, does this save the Empire from the decline that followed when it's capital was sacked as a result of this defeat? Ultimately the Deccan Sultanates had better weapons and would likely be inclined to attempt an invasion again, so would this victory be enough to cement Vijayanagaran power?
 
If Vijayanagara had won the battle of Talikota decisively defeating the combined forces of the Deccan sultanates it would have remained the sole power in South India. Their Empire would have lasted to lord over the South while the Mughals conquered the North India. The batle of Talikota was in 1565 and the 2nd battle of Panipat which cemented the Mughal Empire was in 1556. Vijayanagara in the South and Mughals in the North would have resulted in a power struggle similar to the one between Vijayanagara and the Bahmani Kingdom, on a larger pan-Indian scale covering the whole subcontinent. The rise of the Marathas could be butterflied away as the reason for the rise of Shivaji doesn't occur. Shivaji might have ended up as a commander in the Vijayanagar Army.
 
Top