alternatehistory.com

Ok, the idea is to have the US Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps use the same fighter as a matter of policy starting in WWII. The advantages are simple enough: lower research and development costs, more standardization of training and maintenence, etc. OTL the USN and USAF both used the F-4 as their primary fighter in the 70s until the F-teens came along.

My own idea is for the F4U to get put into production earlier and get into action in the Pacific with the USN/USMC. Once the USAAF sees how effective the Corsair is, they decide to hang drop tanks on it and use it as an escort, later turning it into a strike fighter as well. The air superiority role can be left to the Spitfire.

In the 40s/50s, the Navy can decide to stay with the FJ-2, the F-86's naval cousin, instead of the F9F and F7U. In the 60s/70s, go with the F-4 as in OTL.

In the late 70s, the USN/USMC can adopt a naval variant of the F-15. The thing is built like a tank and has plenty of power to get it off the deck.

The problem is with the 5th gen fighters. The Raptor may be able to handle carrier takeoffs, but I'm worried that reinforcing the structure for carrier landings will affect performance. And I remember reading that the sea air and rough conditions really did a number on the stealth coating. Is there a way to solve these problems, or is another design in order?
Top