sure... in the 19th Century. And the first couple years of the 20th, against Spain. But now, in the 21st Century? We don't do that anymore.The United States actually has waged wars of territorial expansion.
sure... in the 19th Century. And the first couple years of the 20th, against Spain. But now, in the 21st Century? We don't do that anymore.The United States actually has waged wars of territorial expansion.
sure... in the 19th Century. And the first couple years of the 20th, against Spain. But now, in the 21st Century? We don't do that anymore.
Of course, it's all about trying to copy-paste our form of government onto other nations now.
Blair grows a pair and tells the clearly demented Bush to go shove it, reaffirming that he won't be playing second fiddle to an actual imperialist, and that it's gone way to far. That, or he doubles down on his support despite a near unanimous popular opinion, resulting in the only situation where Charles Kennedy could win in 2005.Considering the vitriol which quickly built up against Bush and Blair, the US would run the risk of becoming a global pariah.
Not to mention the fact that Iraq would be to the US what Northern Ireland was to Britain at the height of the 'troubles' from the early 70's to the mid 90's - only 20 times worse!
What role would Britain play in tis by the way?
Blair grows a pair and tells the clearly demented Bush to go shove it, reaffirming that he won't be playing second fiddle to an actual imperialist, and that it's gone way to far. That, or he doubles down on his support despite a near unanimous popular opinion, resulting in the only situation where Charles Kennedy could win in 2005.