In the 1770's Spain found itself involved in another war with Britain, this time over its support for the rebellion in Britain's American colonies. Though their involvement would yield successes the costs of the war grew enough that Spain saw fit to yet again increase taxes throughout their empire in 1778. Always an unpopular move, the natives of its American colonies were already exploited and severely oppressed as it was. Though the encomienda system was officially abolished many natives were pushed into forced labor, and willing or not they generally worked for small wages, and what little wages they did earned were heavily taxed by local governors and extorted by the church. So the news of an increased tax all throughout the Empire was understandably appalling.
Enter José Gabriel Condorcanqui, a member of the native nobility who traced his lineage back to Tupac Amaru, the last Inca ruler to have lived. As a leader of the local native community he had a great sympatyh and understanding of the plight of the Indios in the Viceroyalty of Peru. He used his wealth to help people out as much as he could, but his pleas for help to alleviate the condition of the Empire's citizens fell on deaf ears. And so, inspired by tales of ancient Inca leaders, he took the name of his claimed ancestor for himself and planned a rebellion against the colonial government, ostensibly in the name of the King of Spain against a corrupt leadership in the colonies. Now, despite taking the very Inca name of Tupac Amaru II and being motivated primarily by the plight of native peoples in Peru, this wasn't purely a native rebellion. Tupac gathered the support of other classes of Peruvian society, particularly mestizos but also blacks and even native-born whites lacking the privileges of the Peninsulares. A major motive for the rebels was resentment towards the corrupt local elite, primarily the Spanish-born elite, that had a negative impact on almost all social classes in the Viceroyalty.
However, the bulk of the rebel forces were still composed of natives who had a grudge against the Spanish and this would come to tear apart the rebellion as the lack of discipline in Tupac's army allowed some rebels to viciously slaughter civilians without orders, alienating the creoles and leading many to desertion. Perhaps the death knell for the rebellion though was Tupac's failure to capture Cuzco before the Spanish fully mobilized against him, something his wife urged him to do. With support for the rebels vanishing and the Spanish gaining strength and even local recruits the rebellion was doomed. Tupac Amaru II was eventually tortured, saw his family murdered before his eyes, then torn apart by horses and with over 100,000 dead even Simon Bolivar's war failed to stir much rebellion in the desolation of Peru.
Now enter the ATL proposal. Let's say somehow that Tupac is able to get more of a grip on his army and instill some military discipline and drilling. Perhaps some local militias join him for whatever reason. Now the outrages against the local population that chased non-Indians away from the rebellion don't happen, or aren't as commonplace as to render Spanish propaganda efforts effective. Furthermore, his better disciplined army is able to march on Cuzco before the Spanish can move against him and gives the rebellion a strong base to grow from. As the rebellion grows Tupac Amaru is able to link up with Tupac Katari, an indigenous leader in what is now Bolivia who was inspired by Amaru's rebellion and so gave himself the same name in Aymara and did much the same thing, proclaiming himself a viceroy of Tupac Amaru II. Katari lays siege to La Paz and with Amaru's support is able to take it.
Here's where things get iffy and I might have to start handwaving. From what little I've read of the Tupac Rebellion the guy might've been hinging on some support from the British. Spain is still at war with Britain and assuming he hangs on long enough for Britain to move its focus from the lost colonies it's not impossible to imagine Britain wanting to pay back Spain's interference by doing the same thing to them and giving a little bit of aid to the Peruvian rebels. Which would make this incredibly ironic, Spain's support for a rebellion that started because of taxes leads them to raise taxes that starts a rebellion that gets British support. And it's not impossible that Tupac Amaru heard of the Americans' cause, it was pretty big news at the time and a very radical idea that made waves.
Now, with British support I'm going to suggest that Tupac Amaru and Tupac Katari might end up victorious against Spain, at least in the short run. While the rebellion was ostensibly done in the name of the King (at least on Amaru's part, can't see Katari getting away with claiming to be viceroy to some Inca in Peru and still loyal to the King of Spain) it's unlikely the King will agree and independence is likely the desired result by him and his rebels anyway. So what kind of state would Tupac Amaru II form? A republic like the new union of American states? Or a resurgence of the old Inca monarchy? And what are the repercussions for the Spanish Empire and the rest of the world that are likely to follow?
Enter José Gabriel Condorcanqui, a member of the native nobility who traced his lineage back to Tupac Amaru, the last Inca ruler to have lived. As a leader of the local native community he had a great sympatyh and understanding of the plight of the Indios in the Viceroyalty of Peru. He used his wealth to help people out as much as he could, but his pleas for help to alleviate the condition of the Empire's citizens fell on deaf ears. And so, inspired by tales of ancient Inca leaders, he took the name of his claimed ancestor for himself and planned a rebellion against the colonial government, ostensibly in the name of the King of Spain against a corrupt leadership in the colonies. Now, despite taking the very Inca name of Tupac Amaru II and being motivated primarily by the plight of native peoples in Peru, this wasn't purely a native rebellion. Tupac gathered the support of other classes of Peruvian society, particularly mestizos but also blacks and even native-born whites lacking the privileges of the Peninsulares. A major motive for the rebels was resentment towards the corrupt local elite, primarily the Spanish-born elite, that had a negative impact on almost all social classes in the Viceroyalty.
However, the bulk of the rebel forces were still composed of natives who had a grudge against the Spanish and this would come to tear apart the rebellion as the lack of discipline in Tupac's army allowed some rebels to viciously slaughter civilians without orders, alienating the creoles and leading many to desertion. Perhaps the death knell for the rebellion though was Tupac's failure to capture Cuzco before the Spanish fully mobilized against him, something his wife urged him to do. With support for the rebels vanishing and the Spanish gaining strength and even local recruits the rebellion was doomed. Tupac Amaru II was eventually tortured, saw his family murdered before his eyes, then torn apart by horses and with over 100,000 dead even Simon Bolivar's war failed to stir much rebellion in the desolation of Peru.
Now enter the ATL proposal. Let's say somehow that Tupac is able to get more of a grip on his army and instill some military discipline and drilling. Perhaps some local militias join him for whatever reason. Now the outrages against the local population that chased non-Indians away from the rebellion don't happen, or aren't as commonplace as to render Spanish propaganda efforts effective. Furthermore, his better disciplined army is able to march on Cuzco before the Spanish can move against him and gives the rebellion a strong base to grow from. As the rebellion grows Tupac Amaru is able to link up with Tupac Katari, an indigenous leader in what is now Bolivia who was inspired by Amaru's rebellion and so gave himself the same name in Aymara and did much the same thing, proclaiming himself a viceroy of Tupac Amaru II. Katari lays siege to La Paz and with Amaru's support is able to take it.
Here's where things get iffy and I might have to start handwaving. From what little I've read of the Tupac Rebellion the guy might've been hinging on some support from the British. Spain is still at war with Britain and assuming he hangs on long enough for Britain to move its focus from the lost colonies it's not impossible to imagine Britain wanting to pay back Spain's interference by doing the same thing to them and giving a little bit of aid to the Peruvian rebels. Which would make this incredibly ironic, Spain's support for a rebellion that started because of taxes leads them to raise taxes that starts a rebellion that gets British support. And it's not impossible that Tupac Amaru heard of the Americans' cause, it was pretty big news at the time and a very radical idea that made waves.
Now, with British support I'm going to suggest that Tupac Amaru and Tupac Katari might end up victorious against Spain, at least in the short run. While the rebellion was ostensibly done in the name of the King (at least on Amaru's part, can't see Katari getting away with claiming to be viceroy to some Inca in Peru and still loyal to the King of Spain) it's unlikely the King will agree and independence is likely the desired result by him and his rebels anyway. So what kind of state would Tupac Amaru II form? A republic like the new union of American states? Or a resurgence of the old Inca monarchy? And what are the repercussions for the Spanish Empire and the rest of the world that are likely to follow?