WI Tirpitz sortied with Bismarck 1941?

If the Germans get ships that were already sunk or never completed, can the British get some of those too? Or would that be unfair?

No, but they can get an early A-bomb, and therefore fulfil the retrospectively long-held desire of nuking a German fleet France.
 

Deleted member 92195

So the answer to my question is No you can’t do it without an unrealistically expanded KM and other ASB aspects.

I'm one of the most logical persons around, I don't do hyper inflated scenarios.

If the Germans get ships that were already sunk or never completed, can the British get some of those too? Or would that be unfair?

It's all dependent on the scenario, the French fleet at this point is a puppet of Nazi Germany. Now you say it, I don't know why the British did not salvage the French fleet after sinking it. Out of respect, I suppose.

Poor Brest - as if it wasn't bombed enough as it was :'(

............................................................................................
 
It's all dependent on the scenario, the French fleet at this point is a puppet of Nazi Germany. Now you say it, I don't know why the British did not salvage the French fleet after sinking it. Out of respect, I suppose.
Irrespective of whether the Germans get the French fleet (which is a stretch anyway), the Graf Spee and the Blucher were already at the bottom of the sea in 1941, so they would not take part in any fleet action. Except maybe as ghostships, which would probably be a gamechanger in favor of the Germans.
 
And you list the Deutschland and the Lützow. The Deutschland was renamed Lützow in 1940, after the original Lützow went to the Soviet Union.
 
And you list the Deutschland and the Lützow. The Deutschland was renamed Lützow in 1940, after the original Lützow went to the Soviet Union.

I am trying to work out if he means for the Deutschland to bifurcate and then form two new versions of itself in the world's first case of shipular mitosis or if he is somehow getting the incomplete Lutzow back from Stalin though at this point that seems too prosaic.
 
Pre-second world war the German aim to build Plan Z was impossible, however, their building of some ships was sufficient enough for a small sized fleet. In regards to the sailing of the German fleet from the ports of North Germany, it is down to Herman Goring and Luftwaffe who failed to protect the German navy. It could be said that if the navy had its own Air Force then this scenario would more likely have happened because the navy would have been inclined to use the correct tactics to protect their method of war. However, in my scenario, I do not base this on the fleet being able to sail because Goring is too powerful and he would never have let it happen.

In regards to the actual battle group, it would consist of the following:
  • Bismarck
  • Tirpitz
  • Scharnhorst
  • Gneisenau
  • Graf Zeppelin
  • Admiral Graf Spee (becomes a partner of the battle group halfway through the journey in the Mid-Atlantic)
  • Admiral Scheer
  • Deutschland
  • Four type XI U-boats (U-112, U-113, U-114, and U-115) - I always thought these types of U-boat's would be cool, in any case, if the U-boat type must be cancelled then it can be replaced with IX or IXC/40 U-boat types. I just wanted something a bit more than the VIIC.
  • Admiral Hipper
  • Blücher
  • Prinz Eugen
  • Seydlitz
  • Lützow
The outbreak of this fleet would be in contention with entire British fleet because of its sheer size. However, that occurred with Bismarck anyway, but this surface fleet has two weapons that Bismarck did not have in the original operation. U-boats and an aircraft carrier. In respect Graf Zeppelin it was inferior but that does not take the fact she could launch her own sorties against the enemy. Upon her arrival in Brest, all the vessels would have to serviced and obviously, would be under heavy protection. During this service, Scharnhorst and Gneisenau are both refitted with six 38 cm (15 inch) SK C/34 naval guns in two turrets.

The Kriegsmarine has three serious issues but they are solvable. Ironically these issues are also the reasons why the Nazi’s never captured the French Fleet. These issues are:
  1. Germans saw a blockade of the British Isles using submarines as a way to force the United Kingdom into starvation and capitulation and did not see a strategic plan in which the naval forces would play a major role. This was due to the continental, land-centred, mentality.
  2. Hitler quickly became disillusioned the surface fleet performance, whose one great success was the sinking of the British battlecruiser Hood. When the German lost the Bismarck, the pride of the Kriegsmarine, shortly afterwards, it was the second in a growing list of major German warship losses, following on from the Graf Spee.
  3. It was not possible to maintain Panzer units, the Luftwaffe and a surface fleet.
The first two can be avoided through a competent admiral of the fleet, it's the third which is in short supply.

Going back to the fleet in Brest there a number of naval operations she could be used for and they are:
  • Dominate the Atlantic cutting off all trade from the US to the UK and as a consequence of this will also cut off the trade to the USSR.
  • The fleet’s successful outbreak will embolden Benito Mussolini in the Mediterranean to fight against the British Mediterranean fleet, She could, therefore, sail to the Mediterranean and assist.
  • In sailing to the Mediterranean she could become apart of Operation Felix in capturing Gibraltar. This would enter Spain into the war.
  • The coolest of the operations, capturing the French Fleet with a BIG SURPRISE. In 1940 it was scattered across Dakar, Casablanca, Toulon and Mers-el-Kébir. I have hypothesised countless times on how to capture it. The best I got was to capture it with German Paratroopers using the Italian Fleet. Large cargo planes were in blueprint design at this stage so the best solution was to beach the paratroopers next to Mers-el-Kébir using surface vessels and slowly take over the city to avoid the French vessels being depth charged. Two paratrooper regiments would then make their way to Dakar and do the same. The tricky situation is the British and their bombing of the French fleet. The German paratroopers would defend both Dakar and Mers-el-Kébir with the French, you also have the Italians assisting at Mers-el-Kébir. It's a long shot as they would be sitting on the French fleet for entire year before the German fleet would be able to escort them to Toulon. Not many people know this, but after Poland and France were invaded they sent their gold reserves to Dakar in West Africa. There were $64 million of Polish gold reserves and 198 tons of Belgium/French gold reserves, which I have calculated to be $422,696,800. (I hope I am correct.)
  • Once she has been to Dakar and Casablanca and entered the Mediterranian and has been to Mers-el-Kébir and Toulon. The want for an island is brewing: 'Malta'. Now we have a German, French and Italian Fleet to bombard them into submission. The use of Paratroopers could then be used to occupy the island and as a result, supplies increase to the Africa Korps.
  • The final operation is what battleships should be commonly used for, bombardment. One battle of El Alamein by this time is going to take place regardless because deserts in North Africa do not leave much room.
The great opportunity about all the vessels at Brest is that you can break the fleet up and conduct a number of naval operations at the same time in relation to its geographical position. In regards to the gold at Dakar, it could be used for a number of different methods. Building new ships are pointless at this time in the war, but it could be used bargain with Hitler. I give you gold, you give me fuel to operate my German and French fleets.

The Germans capturing Gibraltar is definite victory, capturing Malta and winning El Alamein is no way back, prepare for Generalplan Ost.


This entire post relies on ASB levels of competence, free resources, and the like for the Germans. Sorry, I dont see how this is even quasi-realistiic at all.
 

nbcman

Donor
I'm one of the most logical persons around, I don't do hyper inflated scenarios.



It's all dependent on the scenario, the French fleet at this point is a puppet of Nazi Germany. Now you say it, I don't know why the British did not salvage the French fleet after sinking it. Out of respect, I suppose.



............................................................................................

Speaking of salvage, how about have the Nazi's salvage Bayern and the rest from Scapa Flow. Genius way to expand the KM - just do it when the RN isn't looking.

The RN only sank a single BB during the attack at Mers-el-Kebir plus a tugboat. Pretty slim salvage pickings. Please read up on topics before making such pie in the sky claims as the British sank the French Fleet.
 
Last edited:

Deleted member 92195

This entire post relies on ASB levels of competence, free resources, and the like for the Germans. Sorry, I dont see how this is even quasi-realistiic at all.

All that is required is competent anti-aircraft cover and the correct use of the Luftwaffe. Fuel is a sticking point but as it stated in the post the Germans did "not see a strategic plan in which the naval forces would play a major role" and this applies to their own navy because the did not have the required competence, 'foresight' to plan naval operations. If sending a battleship and cruiser into the Atlantic is going to contribute anything then I am Elvis Presley, which I am not. This scenario is fantastic for finishing off Britain before Hitler starts conquering the Soviet Union. For example, the American use of 'island hopping' in the Pacific is genius. Invade an island using marines and bombard them with air cover and battleships and lead the American air force, navy and army up to Japan and then bomb them with nukes. Instead of invading indo-china or Japan directly which would cause millions of causalities.

In respect to my hypothesised operation, there were six others out of the seven and it could actually fail, probably where they have to wait for a year. But the scenario is overall complicated, as well for the British in the Meditteranean because they battling the Italians. Like I said the scenario is not fully developed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Deleted member 92195

And you list the Deutschland and the Lützow. The Deutschland was renamed Lützow in 1940, after the original Lützow went to the Soviet Union.

I am trying to work out if he means for the Deutschland to bifurcate and then form two new versions of itself in the world's first case of shipular mitosis or if he is somehow getting the incomplete Lutzow back from Stalin though at this point that seems too prosaic.

The list is in order of ship type, I am referring to the incomplete Lützow (heavy cruiser), I wrote Deutschland to distinguish the two. One gets confused when thinking, writing and then you come across an error!
 
Hitler would react by demanding that all German capital ships be scrapped for being a waste of resources and Raeder would resign. Basically what happened after Operation Rainbow except happening in 1941 instead of 1943.

Probably would have helped Germany more in the war.
 
the two German BBs sortie together or closing of Arctic route?

The 'Big nazi Fleet Battle'. The scenarios I observed or heard about varied in size. A dozen ships on the table was a fair sized game with rules like General Quarters.

If the Germans get ships that were already sunk or never completed, can the British get some of those too? Or would that be unfair?

No. #1 rule of nazi fanbois is the opposition never gets a break.
 
I’m hearing “TF38/58 takes a winter holiday and eats the entire Amassed fleet alive, since battleships are notoriously weak to amassed carrier bombers.”

Except it’ll be even more overwhelming in this scenario, because if France falling lead to the two oceans navy act...
 
Last edited:
There is a simpler way for the Axis to win the battle of the Atlantic. I believe biggest strategic failure of the Axis was to not close the Med in the summer/fall of 1940. Had they taken Gibraltar and the Suez they would have effectively gained the Italian fleet. Now that fleet was not really prepared to fight in the Atlantic, but based in Gibraltar it could have put a serious crimp in convoy routing. Plus it protects Italy from any internal damage.

I firmly believe if this had happened that by mid 1941 Britain (provided they couldn't get back into the Med) would have negotiated a armistice.
 
There is a simpler way for the Axis to win the battle of the Atlantic. I believe biggest strategic failure of the Axis was to not close the Med in the summer/fall of 1940. Had they taken Gibraltar and the Suez they would have effectively gained the Italian fleet. Now that fleet was not really prepared to fight in the Atlantic, but based in Gibraltar it could have put a serious crimp in convoy routing. Plus it protects Italy from any internal damage.

I firmly believe if this had happened that by mid 1941 Britain (provided they couldn't get back into the Med) would have negotiated a armistice.

May I ask, how do you propose to take Gibraltar? Assuming as per OTL that Spain won't play, I can't see how Gibraltar can be taken.
 
I'm not sure what opportunities there are in the Med. The Axis has already achieved its main strategic aim of closing it to British convoys. There's the siege of Malta, of course, but the German squadron at Brest was there throughout 1941 and it didn't divert sufficient British strength from the Med to achieve anything there.

I tend to follow the line of thinking that the decisive theatre was in the East, so cutting the Arctic convoys was the priority. Let goods and supplies accumulate in Britain, just stop them from getting to Russia. Concentrate the fleet in Norway. But this is what happened, and it didn't work, because of continual attrition and excessive RN strength.
The thread is about options in the spring of 1941. By that time the supplies were still running east (and back) in German trains.
With less RN heavy units in the Med, and considering that OTL the RM and the RN fought a number of surface actions in which the Italians were limited by lack of fuel and air cover, the possibility of the RM inflicting heavy losses in the RN given both is there.
 
There is a simpler way for the Axis to win the battle of the Atlantic. I believe biggest strategic failure of the Axis was to not close the Med in the summer/fall of 1940. Had they taken Gibraltar and the Suez they would have effectively gained the Italian fleet. Now that fleet was not really prepared to fight in the Atlantic, but based in Gibraltar it could have put a serious crimp in convoy routing. Plus it protects Italy from any internal damage.

I firmly believe if this had happened that by mid 1941 Britain (provided they couldn't get back into the Med) would have negotiated a armistice.

While they are at it perhaps they can also capture New York and London?
 
I always enter a discussion I can win. :rolleyes: It is going to take me a while to construct the argument so don't wait on me. ;)
Well if nothing else you have experienced something new here.

A less than watertight proposal will be ripped to shreds in here by the weight of learned fact.

I commend your enthusiasm and hope in the future you temper it with much greater research and critical thinking. Always play devil's advocate to your own theories. Look upon them as if they were the antithesis to your very being. That way you will spot holes before others do.

Best of luck for your future ventures.
 
If the Germans get ships that were already sunk or never completed, can the British get some of those too? Or would that be unfair?

I assume Archduke was supposing no Norway campaign (and I guess no loss of the Spee at the start of the war); the Graf Zeppelin carrier was more or less completed; or certainly could have been made to be in operating condition without much deviation from the original timeline

Including the pocket battleships with the group is problematic because of their much lower top speed; if one excludes them the German battle group would be extremely fast, and in 1941 the British would be hard pressed to generate a surface warfare battle group to chase them down that could reliably defeat the 4 German capital ships
 
Including the pocket battleships with the group is problematic because of their much lower top speed; if one excludes them the German battle group would be extremely fast, and in 1941 the British would be hard pressed to generate a surface warfare battle group to chase them down that could reliably defeat the 4 German capital ships
That's what carriers are for, slow em down if you need to. Lets also remember whilst the German ships might have a higher top end, cruising speeds will be about the same and that's what will matter most of the time given the distances they have to go to reach convoys.
 
Top