...as evidenced by the commercial disaster of the first Rambo movie...I don't know to many American that glorify Vietnam.
...which by definition excluded the South Vietnamese regime as it existed.I think that most of the Vietnamese just wanted a stable government that didn't exploit them
..And what you people won't comprehend is that the above is the biggest "What if?" connected to Vietnam - the permanent loss of US moral credibility. Any talk of "victory" which ignores this factor and whether it would have been made even worse by the means used is utterly crazed.
Now, you might find such things unpleasant. If so, don't have threads about the US in Vietnam! Because you cannot have them without such factors being discussed - because they are at the center of how the US was able to fight the war, and what the consequences of the war were.
Do you even realize what you're saying? It would amount to mass murder of the Vietnamese people, and - given that it's basically the failed OTL strategy screwed up a couple of notches - not necessarily going to work either. In any case, I'd say it's a loss for all sides as the US will gain some kind of pariah status.How about some sanity to the US bombings of North Vietnam? By this, I mean not having the President chose the day's targets and also elminating the "do not bomb these obvious military targets because those pukes back in DC think they're too politically sensitive" bombing restrictions.
And, while we're at it, throw in a Phoenix Program that's been increased by some order of magnitude such that that all of North Vietnam is now terrified and jumping at every shadow that moved.
The result would be an utterly smashed economy - blowing up dykes would tend to help with that - combined with much of the Communist regime's human infrastructure necessary for maintaining control having been elminated.
Rinse and repeat as necessary for a few years and the people north of the DMZ might very well be begging for the South to come up and save them.
I think that would count as a win, eh?
IMO, the biggest WI about Vietnam is what if the people of South Vietnam were not conquered by a oppressive Communist NOrth Vietnam.
Especially with the OTL example of the Free and Prosperous South Korea as a Could Have Been standing there.
Well, that's it for you.Sieg Heil!
Firstly, why would one make such a stupid assumption? The only genocide committed in the Vietnam War was that by the USA, so it was the Nazi analog.
Secondly, both Nazi Germany and Japan posed a threat to the USA. Northern Vietnam did not. It didn't even pose a threat to the Southern Vietnamese - all the evidence is that Ho Chi Minh was the overwhelmingly popular choice for national leadership,
In summary, you are, I am afraid evil - because you think that anyone who disagrees with you is evil and should be murdered. Nope.
Eventually the Universe just throws you away
Now we have the other side of the Vietnam war coin, the "kill 'em all and let God sort them out" BS.How about some sanity to the US bombings of North Vietnam? By this, I mean not having the President chose the day's targets and also elminating the "do not bomb these obvious military targets because those pukes back in DC think they're too politically sensitive" bombing restrictions.
And, while we're at it, throw in a Phoenix Program that's been increased by some order of magnitude such that that all of North Vietnam is now terrified and jumping at every shadow that moved.
The result would be an utterly smashed economy - blowing up dykes would tend to help with that - combined with much of the Communist regime's human infrastructure necessary for maintaining control having been elminated.
Rinse and repeat as necessary for a few years and the people north of the DMZ might very well be begging for the South to come up and save them.
I think that would count as a win, eh?
Two Bans in less than four pages. over Vietnam.
Technically speaking though, wernt the Linebacker operations (ie the bombing campaigns) pretty much America's only offensive successes in Vietnam?Now we have the other side of the Vietnam war coin, the "kill 'em all and let God sort them out" BS.
As much as those who declare all things American evil, those who fantasize about the U.S killing half of the population of North Vietnam equating victory are flat out idiots.
Advocating genocide is a Banning offense. You just earned it.
We divorce you.
To Coventry with you.
Technically speaking though, wernt the Linebacker operations (ie the bombing campaigns) pretty much America's only offensive successes in Vietnam?
I really don't understand why the Vietnam war is so emotional even today. For heaven's sake even the Vietnamese themselves have gotten over it and hold no grudge against the US. It's almost incredible that some people refuse to buy Vietnamese products...because Vietnam successfully repelled an invasion?!?!I'm always shocked at how much hatred and stupidity come up when there are discussions about the Vietnam War.
People always seem to go to the extreme when talking about the Vietnam war, both ways.
It was a horrible, horrible war where horrible things happened. I love discussing the political and military decisions being made during the war, as well as the more darker parts but i always stay away from it because of what happened in this thread. Its such a shame because in many ways it is a better discussion then WW2. Partially because its still close enough to people(especially Americans), which of course also brings in the emotions.
I hope people can keep their emotions in check next time the Vietnam War comes up.
But whatever unresolved issues in the US surrounding the war, don't the Vietnamese people have larger ones (e.g. Agent Orange, undiscovered bombs, social trauma, etc) by magnitudes? Why have the Vietnamese themselves gotten over them?
Because they won.