I write the former post before that you answered to my principal post here, so you have a copy of the report of ABC, in this case it seems that ABC report had some mistakes (not respect to recall but the data and the possible encounter seems impossible)
You have to calm down, this is a discussion forum and it is normal that the members of the board discuss about the threads and give sources to defend his positions, in this aspect simplily I was supporting with arguments the fact that it physically could not be possible that encounter.
I don´t think that you "are making the whole thing up", simplily it is easy to see that the route of carrier striking force made this impossible, is because this that my first supposition that it could be that you remembered bad some part of the report, in this case you have a copy (a thing that initially I did not know, I thought that you were making an exercise of memory), sorry to say this but ABC not made a good work of research, at least it should have explained at that report how a fleet that departed at 06 hours 26 november from Kuriles (at this is Tokyo Time, so in reality it is some hours later according to US time) could find Flying tigers transport ships the same 26 november, at least that the report explain that the Carrier Striking Force departed some days before of the 26 november and naturally this would be conspiracy theory and necessary to be proved by that report.
BTW: Could be CalBear and me have disagreed in some discussions about different themes but I should say you that he is probably the best expert in the board about Pacific War and one of the best respect to World War II military history and Cold War military history in the board so it is normal that when you put these threads it begin to stay nervous, he could use an overdosis of irony in some cases or even sarcasm but it is clear that he has a lot of knowledge about Pacific War, more than you, me and a lot of the members of the board, so you have to base in more than one source your threads or he will have a lot of reason in making a hard critic.
Originally posted by bard32
If you think I'm making the whole thing up, just come right out and say it, instead of shooting down everything I post here.
You have to calm down, this is a discussion forum and it is normal that the members of the board discuss about the threads and give sources to defend his positions, in this aspect simplily I was supporting with arguments the fact that it physically could not be possible that encounter.
I don´t think that you "are making the whole thing up", simplily it is easy to see that the route of carrier striking force made this impossible, is because this that my first supposition that it could be that you remembered bad some part of the report, in this case you have a copy (a thing that initially I did not know, I thought that you were making an exercise of memory), sorry to say this but ABC not made a good work of research, at least it should have explained at that report how a fleet that departed at 06 hours 26 november from Kuriles (at this is Tokyo Time, so in reality it is some hours later according to US time) could find Flying tigers transport ships the same 26 november, at least that the report explain that the Carrier Striking Force departed some days before of the 26 november and naturally this would be conspiracy theory and necessary to be proved by that report.
BTW: Could be CalBear and me have disagreed in some discussions about different themes but I should say you that he is probably the best expert in the board about Pacific War and one of the best respect to World War II military history and Cold War military history in the board so it is normal that when you put these threads it begin to stay nervous, he could use an overdosis of irony in some cases or even sarcasm but it is clear that he has a lot of knowledge about Pacific War, more than you, me and a lot of the members of the board, so you have to base in more than one source your threads or he will have a lot of reason in making a hard critic.