Suppose that, twenty years down the road from a Confederate victory, another state votes to secede for some reason. Without violence, it goes to the Supreme Court, which rules that secession is constitutional.
Suppose that, twenty years down the road from a Confederate victory, another state votes to secede for some reason. Without violence, it goes to the Supreme Court, which rules that secession is constitutional.
There's a lot of "how" missing here -- depending on when and how the CSA achieves it's independence; on how the remaining US copes with the loss in the following (20?) years; and on the nature of the next intended secession. Moreover, how did the US Supreme Court come to get a majority of its are pro-secession? The nature of US politics that would allow such a thing seems like it would be interesting, assuming it could be expanded upon.
Suppose that, twenty years down the road from a Confederate victory, another state votes to secede for some reason. Without violence, it goes to the Supreme Court, which rules that secession is constitutional.
Doubtful since considering in the event of a CSA victory a amendment expressly prohibiting succession would have been proposed and most likely subsequently ratified, not to mentation any state trying to pull a CSA after a lost civil war would not make it past the door before the jack boot of US Military falls on them like one big massive dog pile, thus making any argument in the Supreme Court a mute point.