This style of debate often works in Jr. High, where a little knowledge can be used to beat up someone with none. It works poorly when both sides have near equal understanding. You have demonstrated reliance on it, even when, perhaps especially when, you have a weak position.Which is why you need to read both sources instead of just cherry picking one, with the second going into more detail. Specifically, the lack of Ewell and Hill doing anything of note at Mine Run while Longstreet and Jackson both had gained a reputation for strong flanking attacks, which had become their specialty. Lee's comment is also not just blaming himself, but pointing to the fact he can't make up for his subordinates failures on his own.
No, you're literally taking the single engagement at Bristoe's Station and applying it to the entirety of the campaign. There are literally no other examples of Confederates doing what you claimed, nor even a stubborn defense by the Federals outside of Hill's screw up for which he was castigated for by Lee.
It IS a form of trolling/bullying/arguing in bad faith.
It IS going to stop. One way or another.