alternatehistory.com

OTL, Stalin was from Georgia (Caucasian), but overall let that slip to the wayside so that he could gain more power in the USSR. This is especially evident in WWII, when he began to emphasize Russian history and how it could defend against German aggression.

However, what if, after WWII, Stalin began to settle the areas that had been massively depopulated with ethnic Georgians. OTL, Georgia "only" lost 300,000 people, which meant that it still had 3,000,000 people left. Compare this to Belarus, which lost nearly a quarter of it's population.

My thought is that if Stalin wanted purely "Georgian" areas, you'd need to have even more civilian deaths than OTL in those areas to empty them enough so that there would be purely "Georgian." (say, Hitler put Slavs in the same category as other victims of the Holocaust and demanded they be exterminated in the areas that Germany held) Even then, there aren't really enough Georgians at all to fill those areas, so there would also need to be some... less than ethical breeding and assimilation policies.

If it happened OTL with no changes, I could see some of the most hard hit areas of Belarus and Ukraine being at least bilingual, though it would need a consistent pressure to keep those areas from assimilating into the local cultures. Overall, though, Stalin would just end up creating a "West Georgian" national identity, which will be... fun to sort out after the fall of the USSR--Though once Stalin dies, unless Stalin grooms his successor to keep up assimilation they would eventually just assimilate into the local culture.

What do you think?
Top