Take a look at the date on this thread, it is 6 years old!
Aug 5, 2012 #22 Corbell Mark IV Cook said: Take a look at the date on this thread, it is 6 years old! Click to expand... THat's true, but upon reading it, it is a good question and there are obvious points that were never explored. IMO this would be reasonable to discuss.
Cook said: Take a look at the date on this thread, it is 6 years old! Click to expand... THat's true, but upon reading it, it is a good question and there are obvious points that were never explored. IMO this would be reasonable to discuss.
Aug 5, 2012 #23 oudi14 I didn't notice the date, not that it would have changed anything I said. Nor was it I was the one that pulled it out of the archives.
I didn't notice the date, not that it would have changed anything I said. Nor was it I was the one that pulled it out of the archives.
