WI: Russian Fascism/Hypernationalism?

Otl, the russian revolution gave a new, scary face to leftism in europe and America. An aggressive communist power that seeked to spread revolution to its old empire.
But what if the bolsheviks lost the power struggle, not to Kerensky, but to a hypernationalist, slavic-supremicst (and Rus over other slavs) regime? I'm admittedly ignorant of plausibility or effects so.. .
 
I think its likely. Anti-semitism, especially, was far more likely to occur in Russia than anywhere else. Change some things in 1917 and its possible you will find a fascist regime come to power, incorporating things like anti-monarchism, rejection of the Orthodox church, anti-communism, anti-Semitism, a stab-in-the-back myth, etc.
 
I think its likely. Anti-semitism, especially, was far more likely to occur in Russia than anywhere else. Change some things in 1917 and its possible you will find a fascist regime come to power, incorporating things like anti-monarchism, rejection of the Orthodox church, anti-communism, anti-Semitism, a stab-in-the-back myth, etc.
Wouldn’t monarchism and Orthodox Church be seen as core aspects of Russian identity just like the Spanish Fascists saw theirs?
 
Had an idea in this vein with Lavr Kornilov as the Hitler* character
According to the views of Kornilov, it is rather close to DNVP or Freikorps. Rather, the most ideal substitute would be Pavel Gorgulov (he is well known in the Russian AI community).
In 1931, Gorgulov published in French a political brochure about Russia, the National Peasant (Nationale paysanne). According to his theory, the state should be governed by the dictatorial "national" and "military-political" party of the "green", based on the authority of the "green dictator" (similar to the German principle of the Fuhrer) and strict discipline. The government, the police, and the army are formed from its personnel; Parliament is tolerant only with a majority of members from the dictatorial party. Then, after the transitional period of the dictatorship, a president can be elected, who should be "not a communist, not a socialist, not a monarchist, not a Jew, not a foreigner, not a foreigner, and not a woman." The party can itself be mobilized as a military organization. All agricultural youth (Russian) joins the party without fail. Not only socialism is persecuted, but also monarchism and big capitalism. Persons who do not belong to the Russian people and to the Orthodox religion are deprived of a number of political rights; Jews can not be in any public service, "even the most insignificant." The only way to overthrow the Bolshevik regime (understood largely as the power of the Jews) is through external intervention. The 18th paragraph proclaimed: "Russia for the Russians."
As you see, his views are quite similar to the Nazi ones, although he is oriented towards the peasantry (which brings him closer to the Italian fascists).
 
I think its likely. Anti-semitism, especially, was far more likely to occur in Russia than anywhere else. Change some things in 1917 and its possible you will find a fascist regime come to power, incorporating things like anti-monarchism, rejection of the Orthodox church, anti-communism, anti-Semitism, a stab-in-the-back myth, etc.
Wouldn’t monarchism and Orthodox Church be seen as core aspects of Russian identity just like the Spanish Fascists saw theirs?
In fact, most of those who are called Russian fascists were closer at best to the late phalangists. Although there are examples quite close to the early versions of Italian and German fascism.
 
Top