Oh well, then ...
A Germany run by a "pacifist" ruling body (just goverment at 1919/20 ?), disbanding all army aka soldiers immediatly, supporting no Freikorps, will most likely become an easy prey for the communists ("Spartakists" or "USPD" of this time).
... and will have a damn hard time with millions of soldiers left out with no work, no income, no food (entente blockade still active).
But for the sake of argument :
Whatever goverment there might be, the french will get after them and "bully" them, if you mean the several "reparation"-issues and additional occupations after the armistice, in any case. France made their own finances to a big extent dependent on reparation payments.
Such a pacifist goverment wouldn't be able to get their industrialists on line with them, means Germany would be even more unable to pay reparations
With a pacifist/communist goverment the "Ruhr-industrialists" will be happy to set up an "independant" Rheinland-state under the protection of France - and merge with the french heavy industrie in some way (something famous/infamous Hugo Stinnes already was working on in peacetime prior to WW I on private venture terms).
Arms production was already heavily hampered in 1920 - 1923 by the IMCC und wasn't be able to sore up in some degree before 1924. So -> no real economic "gain" for now. That would need a unified germany passing through the Great Depression with its goverment still intact.