Uhura's Mazda
Banned
So when http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunalilo died in 1874, there was a literal brawl over who would succeed him - Emma (1836 - 1885), the widow of Kamehameha IV; or David Kalakaua, who was a more distant relative. Kalakaua was more popular among the Legislative Assembly, so he won the vote, but Emma appears to have been the darling of the native Hawaiian masses. Now, the only reason there was a vote in the first place was because Lunalilo died before nominating a successor (he was childless) and by all accounts he seems to have favoured Emma for an heir. It has been alleged in hindsight that he wanted to institute a democratic principle in the monarchy by not nominating a successor, but I'm sceptical.
Let's say Lunalilo names Emma, or, if he was as liberal as his supporters alleged, put the issue to a truly popular vote in his will, as opposed to a vote in the Legislative Assembly. Emma becomes Queen - she was less pro-American than Kalakaua, and less likely to push for absolutism, as he did (thereby necessitating the Bayonet Constitution and, eventually, the overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy) - but even if she marries again (and I doubt she will, given her grief over the losses of her son and husband) she's not likely to have more children at the age of 38. This makes another contested election possible upon her death (OTL 1885).
What happens in the last quarter of the 19th century for Hawaii? Do filibusters and annexationists still bring Hawaii under American hegemony? Does the Hawaiian throne pass from one childless second cousin to the next? Could a marriage alliance with Japan go ahead at some point (Princess Ka'iulani was considered by a few Shinnoke and Oke but ultimately rejected OTL)? Predictions? Opinions? Suppositions? Suppositories?
I've compiled a list of all the descendants of Kamehameha I's siblings alive in 1874 from various sources on the web, and a long-lasting dynasty doesn't look too hopeful. I haven't included the Kalakaua and Kawananakoa lines because they're too confusing, and their exclusion from the actual throne is pretty much the point of this WI. Anyway:
- Albert Kunuiakea (1853 - 1903) illegitimate son of Kamehameha III, died childless
- Ruth Ke'elikolani (1826 - 1883) children died young. Her adopted son, W. P. Leleiohoku, was still alive but died in 1877.
- Bernice Pauahi Bishop (1831 - 1884) no issue.
That's it for the descendants of Kamehameha I. Now for the line of his elder brother, Kalokuokamaile:
- Theresa La'anui (1860 - 1944) had issue with a few different husbands, inluding the son of the dude who invented baseball, and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_William_Wilcox
- Elizabeth Keka'aniau La'anui (1834 - 1928) no children, but adopted Theresa and one of her daughters
Now the descendants of Kamehameha's younger brother, Keli'imaika'i:
- Mary Pa'a'aina Griswold (1853 - ?1900) had a daughter:
- Edith G[riswold?] Albert (1872 - ?) who has left no trace, it seems
- Emma Na'ea the Queen Dowager
- Peter Ka'eo (1836 - 1880) a leper, died without children.
TBH, if I was voting when Emma died in the mid-1880s, I'd probably vote for Kalakaua anyway. These guys seem uniformly shit.
EDIT: Both Bernice Pauahi Bishop and Elizabeth Keka'aniau La'anui refused the throne when they were offered it in 1872, so they're out of the running as well.
Let's say Lunalilo names Emma, or, if he was as liberal as his supporters alleged, put the issue to a truly popular vote in his will, as opposed to a vote in the Legislative Assembly. Emma becomes Queen - she was less pro-American than Kalakaua, and less likely to push for absolutism, as he did (thereby necessitating the Bayonet Constitution and, eventually, the overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy) - but even if she marries again (and I doubt she will, given her grief over the losses of her son and husband) she's not likely to have more children at the age of 38. This makes another contested election possible upon her death (OTL 1885).
What happens in the last quarter of the 19th century for Hawaii? Do filibusters and annexationists still bring Hawaii under American hegemony? Does the Hawaiian throne pass from one childless second cousin to the next? Could a marriage alliance with Japan go ahead at some point (Princess Ka'iulani was considered by a few Shinnoke and Oke but ultimately rejected OTL)? Predictions? Opinions? Suppositions? Suppositories?
I've compiled a list of all the descendants of Kamehameha I's siblings alive in 1874 from various sources on the web, and a long-lasting dynasty doesn't look too hopeful. I haven't included the Kalakaua and Kawananakoa lines because they're too confusing, and their exclusion from the actual throne is pretty much the point of this WI. Anyway:
- Albert Kunuiakea (1853 - 1903) illegitimate son of Kamehameha III, died childless
- Ruth Ke'elikolani (1826 - 1883) children died young. Her adopted son, W. P. Leleiohoku, was still alive but died in 1877.
- Bernice Pauahi Bishop (1831 - 1884) no issue.
That's it for the descendants of Kamehameha I. Now for the line of his elder brother, Kalokuokamaile:
- Theresa La'anui (1860 - 1944) had issue with a few different husbands, inluding the son of the dude who invented baseball, and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_William_Wilcox
- Elizabeth Keka'aniau La'anui (1834 - 1928) no children, but adopted Theresa and one of her daughters
Now the descendants of Kamehameha's younger brother, Keli'imaika'i:
- Mary Pa'a'aina Griswold (1853 - ?1900) had a daughter:
- Edith G[riswold?] Albert (1872 - ?) who has left no trace, it seems
- Emma Na'ea the Queen Dowager
- Peter Ka'eo (1836 - 1880) a leper, died without children.
TBH, if I was voting when Emma died in the mid-1880s, I'd probably vote for Kalakaua anyway. These guys seem uniformly shit.
EDIT: Both Bernice Pauahi Bishop and Elizabeth Keka'aniau La'anui refused the throne when they were offered it in 1872, so they're out of the running as well.