redlightning
Banned
What if the jury chosen to acquit the OJ Simpson trial in 1995 ends in a mistrial instead without a verdict?
I think if there was a more educated jury they would probably know something about DNA evidence. Automatically because Simpson's DNA was found at his home, in his White Bronco, at the murder scene mixed with the two different victims, etc. They would've convicted him automatically if it aware of what the difference between DNA and blood type were.
If the trial is given a second effort, new evidence is likely brought into the light. The first is his suicide note from almost being brought to jail. Second will eventually be photographs of him wearing certain types of shoes owned and used at the murder scene. His gloves were strong evidence alone that they were owned by him with the proof of receipt.
The evidence against him as the true killer was overwhelming.