Loghain
Banned
At the very least, biased.
That i might grant, but i mean if the evidence is overhelming you just need someone not entirely dumb to realize that voting innocent would damage the cause,
At the very least, biased.
That i might grant, but i mean if the evidence is overhelming you just need someone not entirely dumb to realize that voting innocent would damage the cause,
So better get a different jury? that would help a lot, maybe just judged locally in brentwood...This was a very racially charged trial with full racism on swing. A guilty veredict would be seen as a victory to white oppression. In these types of situations, emotions rule over reason.
This is like expecting a third wave feminist to rule against Anita Sarkeesian killing her boyfriend, she will not do it, even if she killed him.
So better get a different jury? that would help a lot, maybe just judged locally in brentwood...
The case was always to be a mess....At least a jury that doesnt have an extremist black rights group member.
Also, understanding DNA better too, DNA was new and confusing to the jurors, if I recall correctly.
The case was always to be a mess....
Let's say he did get the guilty veredict but the sentence is just life without parole? thoughts?
On second thought, if that would butterfly away the rise of the Cardashians, I'm all for it.