I see someone geing impeached when 2010 rolls around.
Why? The GOP in OTL controlled the House for the last six years of Obama's presidency and made no attempt to impeach him.
BTW, this whole "president X would face impeachment" is used way too often here. Members of the House are well aware that it takes a two-thirds vote in the Senate to convict, and that recklessly seeking impeachment without any chance of conviction is more likely to damage the party doing the impeaching than the president. If nothing else, the impeachment of Clinton in 1998-9 made that clear. And in any event with Clinton there was a plausible ground of impeachment--there really was a case that he had committed perjury and obstruction of justice. The case was not without its flaws but it was not frivolous either. Impeaching a president because you don't like his Supreme Court choices will just be seen as frivolous political grandstanding.
The failure of the Democrats to seek impeachment of Reagan over Iran-Contra, the failure of the Republican House to seriously consider impeaching Clinton
before Monicagate, the fact that the GOP didn't try to impeach Obama during the six years it controlled the House during his administration (despite the endless Benghazi hearings), and the fact that Pelosi is discouraging talk of impeachment now are all evidence that the House, even when controlled by a party that greatly dislikes the president, doesn't undertake impeachment lightly.