WI in the early 20th centuries the US didn't move towards a system of holding primaries for presidential candidates and many other high offices?
Perhaps instead they are chosen by the party elite, or members of the each parties Congressional Caucuses. Or perhaps rank-and-file party member can vote, but you have to a be a card-carrying, fee-paying member to vote, like in many other nations.
How will this effect who is chosen? Would there be many different choices made?
I admit I don't have that much knowledge about the detailed history of primaries, so if anyone would like to point out any inaccuracies in what I have written, they are welcome to.
Perhaps instead they are chosen by the party elite, or members of the each parties Congressional Caucuses. Or perhaps rank-and-file party member can vote, but you have to a be a card-carrying, fee-paying member to vote, like in many other nations.
How will this effect who is chosen? Would there be many different choices made?
I admit I don't have that much knowledge about the detailed history of primaries, so if anyone would like to point out any inaccuracies in what I have written, they are welcome to.