A common practice in medieval Europe was the division of land amongst all heirs in order to avoid fraternal strife. In the case of larger farms and estates this is indeed a sensable policy, but when applied to Royal successions the results are never good.
Case in point, Poland's Seniorate Constitution quite literally destroyed the fragile early kingdom when all of Boleslav III Piast's sons received part of the kingdom to do with as they will (although the eldest of the line was to remain the nominal king and direct lord of Cracow) upon his death in 1138. The subdivision amongst the Piast cousins continued over the generations, until there were at least 8 functionally independent duchies under the nominal control of the king in Cracow (always the senior Piast heir) by the mid 1200s. This does not even count the duchies of Silesia and Pomerania, which were absorbed into the HRE, or the lands the Teutonic Order seized on the Baltic coast.
It was not until 1314 that the noble Wladislaw Lokietek managed to unite many of the petty Polish states against the Kingdom of Bohemia and abolish the Seniorate... but what if Wenceslas of Bohimia had not provided such a convinient foil with his ambitions?
The near-anarchic patchwork of statelets had been run roughshod over by several invaders (inclusing the Mongols and Crusders) and Germans were settling in increasing numbers by the invitation of various dukes. Without a central government worth the name, could Poland have consolidated itself into several smaller states? Or perhaps creeping assimilation of both nobility and commoners could have resulted in the increasingly Germanized lands joining the "Holy Roman" Empire as the French chewed at the latter's western borders?
Discuss.
HTG
Case in point, Poland's Seniorate Constitution quite literally destroyed the fragile early kingdom when all of Boleslav III Piast's sons received part of the kingdom to do with as they will (although the eldest of the line was to remain the nominal king and direct lord of Cracow) upon his death in 1138. The subdivision amongst the Piast cousins continued over the generations, until there were at least 8 functionally independent duchies under the nominal control of the king in Cracow (always the senior Piast heir) by the mid 1200s. This does not even count the duchies of Silesia and Pomerania, which were absorbed into the HRE, or the lands the Teutonic Order seized on the Baltic coast.
It was not until 1314 that the noble Wladislaw Lokietek managed to unite many of the petty Polish states against the Kingdom of Bohemia and abolish the Seniorate... but what if Wenceslas of Bohimia had not provided such a convinient foil with his ambitions?
The near-anarchic patchwork of statelets had been run roughshod over by several invaders (inclusing the Mongols and Crusders) and Germans were settling in increasing numbers by the invitation of various dukes. Without a central government worth the name, could Poland have consolidated itself into several smaller states? Or perhaps creeping assimilation of both nobility and commoners could have resulted in the increasingly Germanized lands joining the "Holy Roman" Empire as the French chewed at the latter's western borders?
Discuss.
HTG