raharris1973
Gone Fishin'
WI no triple intervention? Germany decides not to reward Russia for its French alliance by providing it support in the Far East. Instead of encouraging Russia to face the Yellow Peril, Germany quietly and diplomatically encourages Japan to stick to its gains in the war against China, recognized at Shimonoseki.
At the time of Shimonoseki, where Japan won Port Arthur from China and a protectorate over Korea, Russia objected. However, it decided to seek to build a diplomatic coalition against Japan instead of going to war. The coalition did succeed in getting Japan to pare back its gains and set the stage for the Russo-Japanese War the next decade.
So the PoD here is that when Russia shops for German diplomatic support, Germany says, "Fix this problem yourself. What, you think you set up an alliance with and we owe you a living? Maybe have your new best friends help you out. Bite me."
Meanwhile Germany discreetly tells Japan it should consider standing firm. Germany is not offering an alliance or any type of commitment, but will as they did with the Turks even during the era of the Three Emperors League, sell Japan arms.
How would things proceed from there:
1) Does France help out Russia and secure a "double intervention" forcing Japan into the same settlement as in OTL? It's not what France had in mind when they signed up, but they might decide the support of Russia is the least worst strategy.
2) If Japan is threatened by just France and Russia, does it fold, or do they seek to hold out?
3) If Russia gets neither German nor French support, how is European politics effected. Can Russian threats alone force Japan out of Port Arthur?
Some considerations are that Japan has just fought a war and is less industrialized than it was in 1904. On the other hand, much less of the Trans-Siberian railroad was constructed, so the Russians have a harder time supporting deployed forces than they would in 1904.
At the time of Shimonoseki, where Japan won Port Arthur from China and a protectorate over Korea, Russia objected. However, it decided to seek to build a diplomatic coalition against Japan instead of going to war. The coalition did succeed in getting Japan to pare back its gains and set the stage for the Russo-Japanese War the next decade.
So the PoD here is that when Russia shops for German diplomatic support, Germany says, "Fix this problem yourself. What, you think you set up an alliance with and we owe you a living? Maybe have your new best friends help you out. Bite me."
Meanwhile Germany discreetly tells Japan it should consider standing firm. Germany is not offering an alliance or any type of commitment, but will as they did with the Turks even during the era of the Three Emperors League, sell Japan arms.
How would things proceed from there:
1) Does France help out Russia and secure a "double intervention" forcing Japan into the same settlement as in OTL? It's not what France had in mind when they signed up, but they might decide the support of Russia is the least worst strategy.
2) If Japan is threatened by just France and Russia, does it fold, or do they seek to hold out?
3) If Russia gets neither German nor French support, how is European politics effected. Can Russian threats alone force Japan out of Port Arthur?
Some considerations are that Japan has just fought a war and is less industrialized than it was in 1904. On the other hand, much less of the Trans-Siberian railroad was constructed, so the Russians have a harder time supporting deployed forces than they would in 1904.