WI: NASA Followed a "Natural" progression?

Actually, we did have to go up to fix the Hubble so it would work, and later for maintenance ( not cheap at all ). But purely economic benefits dictate that the private sector will be the future impetus for space exploration. NASA will become a minor player in the future unless national priorities take a hard right turn in the near future.

But not time and time again like you would have to do with a permanent Moon base.
 
But not time and time again like you would have to do with a permanent Moon base.

Well, yes, we did have to send several space shuttle missions to fix up Hubble, the most recent (and last:() in 2009, IIRC. Granted, that's not nearly the amount of flights that would be needed to maintain a permanent Moon base. However, a Moon base would be a far more expensive commitment than Hubble, both in terms of the initial costs and the regular resupply flights(and their costs).
 
Top