WI: Mary, Queen of Scots marries Henry of Navarre

The age gap between Mary Queen of Scots and Henry of Navarre is the same as the Age Gap between Henry II and Eleanor of Aquitaine so a kid between them is a possibility, if these two do marry, would England accept a union with France and Scotland.
 
Age isn't the gap at issue.

Paris may come to be worth a Mass to Henri Quatre, but that same Mass would cause the three-legged stools to fly early in St Giles', Embra; whereas Mary, less a devout RC than a born Guisard, with no gift for compromise, would not marry the as yet unreconciled Huguenot Champion (which he must be at the time of any marriage if Mary is to be young enough to bear a child) for any consideration less than securing her kingdom and assuring the succession to the English Crown. The English are under no circumstances going to accept a prospective Henry-and-Mary succession that is not absolutely and irrevocably "anti-papist" (no matter how many recusants there are in country cottages and country houses), because London and East Anglia won't wear that for a moment. And that's without the purely secular xenophobia on both sides of the Auld Alliance v England spitting-match. The mere prospect of a child between these two with claims to a personal union of these three kingdoms would set every sword in Christendom fighting, let alone cause the Tudor beacons to flare from every down and hill and peak in England.
 
Paris may come to be worth a Mass to Henri Quatre, but that same Mass would cause the three-legged stools to fly early in St Giles', Embra; whereas Mary, less a devout RC than a born Guisard, with no gift for compromise, would not marry the as yet unreconciled Huguenot Champion (which he must be at the time of any marriage if Mary is to be young enough to bear a child) for any consideration less than securing her kingdom and assuring the succession to the English Crown. The English are under no circumstances going to accept a prospective Henry-and-Mary succession that is not absolutely and irrevocably "anti-papist" (no matter how many recusants there are in country cottages and country houses), because London and East Anglia won't wear that for a moment. And that's without the purely secular xenophobia on both sides of the Auld Alliance v England spitting-match. The mere prospect of a child between these two with claims to a personal union of these three kingdoms would set every sword in Christendom fighting, let alone cause the Tudor beacons to flare from every down and hill and peak in England.

But the Habsburgs would do anything for their potential children to fight like what the French Kings did to the Plantagenets.
 
Which Habsburg, and when?

Here's where you really need to decide on a date for your suggestion of a match. There's a fairly narrow window in which Henry is old enough to father a child and Mary young enough to bear one; and picking a year would make things much clearer to all concerned. After all, by the time Henry was twenty, Mary was not only past thirty, but married to Bothwell ... and had been, for eight years.

But handwave that. We still need a date. Because ... well, again: which Habsburg and when? Maximilian? Rudolf? I can't see the policy from the HRE's perspective here. Or do you mean Phil the Spaniard? Because of course he has if anything less interest in promoting a Navarre-Stuart match than do Elizabeth or the Guises who are Phil's agents as well as being out for what they can get for themselves (after all, Felipe didn't send an Armada OTL to rescue Mary; he waited until her death gave him a claim to (re-)claim the English crown, and this time in his own right and not jure uxoris).

I just don't see where you are going, here, and less now than before your response; and, with the greatest respect, until you nail these details down, I'm not betting the farm that you see where you're going either.
 
Here's where you really need to decide on a date for your suggestion of a match. There's a fairly narrow window in which Henry is old enough to father a child and Mary young enough to bear one; and picking a year would make things much clearer to all concerned. After all, by the time Henry was twenty, Mary was not only past thirty, but married to Bothwell ... and had been, for eight years.

But handwave that. We still need a date. Because ... well, again: which Habsburg and when? Maximilian? Rudolf? I can't see the policy from the HRE's perspective here. Or do you mean Phil the Spaniard? Because of course he has if anything less interest in promoting a Navarre-Stuart match than do Elizabeth or the Guises who are Phil's agents as well as being out for what they can get for themselves (after all, Felipe didn't send an Armada OTL to rescue Mary; he waited until her death gave him a claim to (re-)claim the English crown, and this time in his own right and not jure uxoris).

I just don't see where you are going, here, and less now than before your response; and, with the greatest respect, until you nail these details down, I'm not betting the farm that you see where you're going either.

Perhaps we could have Mary to have a daughter with her French King husband, then her husband dies and pulls an Eleanor of Aquitaine and marry Henry of Navarre, her daughter from her first husband is married to Don Carlos and Mary has a son to Henry of Navarre.
 
Top