In 1700, Carlos II of Spain died, bequeathing all of his territorial heritage to Philippe d'Anjou, grandson of Louis XIV. The Sun King brings together several people around him on the approach to follow: they unanimously agreed to accept the will of Carlos II. However, this aroused the displeasure of the Austrians, but in addition, Louis XIV also aroused the ire of the maritime powers by preserving Pilippus his rights to the crown of France and by recognizing James III as king of England. War therefore broke out.
What if the Sun King had died for example in 1698 or 1699? Could his successor, the Dauphin, alias Louis XV ITTL, have better managed this embarrassment of the Spanish heritage by making territorial concessions to the Austrians (Milanese, Italy, Netherlands) and by avoiding provoking the maritime powers? Or would he have done like his father? At least, if he leans for the first option, France would not be ruined in the years 1700-1710. Even, France would keep some cities in the Netherlands (Veurne, Ieper, Menen, Tournai) that it lost IOTL to the treaty of Utrecht and would keep Acadia and Newfoundland. And Spain would keep the Rock of Gibraltar.
What if the Sun King had died for example in 1698 or 1699? Could his successor, the Dauphin, alias Louis XV ITTL, have better managed this embarrassment of the Spanish heritage by making territorial concessions to the Austrians (Milanese, Italy, Netherlands) and by avoiding provoking the maritime powers? Or would he have done like his father? At least, if he leans for the first option, France would not be ruined in the years 1700-1710. Even, France would keep some cities in the Netherlands (Veurne, Ieper, Menen, Tournai) that it lost IOTL to the treaty of Utrecht and would keep Acadia and Newfoundland. And Spain would keep the Rock of Gibraltar.