Well otherwise your comments were pretty accurate.
But Scholastic thought is highly nuanced, and very very different from the Classical thought it was influenced by. By the high middle ages, Aristotelians were only broadly Aristotelian. They had a lot of different opinions that Aristotle. Even from the very beginning of the middle ages, people were disagreeing with Aristotle on a variety of points, and these things just sort of kept piling up until medieval Aristotelianism had only broad similarities with classical Aristotelianism, with the specifics wildly different.
Also of note is that the Geocentric model was indeed modified due to Galileo's writings. But only with the things that were absolutely proven at the time, like the moons of Jupiter. These sorts of modifications happened all the time. As somebody else has suggested, the church didn't like to throw away centuries of established fact without a lot of pondering and fact checking, and were perfectly amiable to new scientific ideas which could be shown to actually be true.