Again, the longer the process, the higher the possibility of abandonment. Not all rulers are keen on supporting their predecessor's policies, while the ruler and the court would not be willing to show support if native raiding parties continue to destabilize the area. In addition, it will require a significant amount of resources to build even one fortress, along with the fact that the soldiers cannot be high in proportion to the total amount of settlers for a stable settlement to be established. If the migrants somehow manage to number around 1,000 before the state's downfall, which in itself is probably highly unlikely, around 50-200 of them will be soldiers, and 400-600 will be farmers, hunters, or traders, so that leaves only a few hundred at most for builders, as half the population would be theoretically composed of women.
With such a small population, it will probably take a decade to build just one fort, not to mention the required costs for expanding the structure, along with rebuilding and/or renovation. Those who attempt to explore the area for more resources in order to expand/contribute to the fort and/or settlement can be easily ambushed due to low numbers, and either structure can easily be attacked before preparations are complete, at which point the costs are much higher than the benefits. Although I certainly realize that several forts in a row can serve as a firm bulwark against potential invasions, such as the ones used by Goguryeo against the Sui and Tang, the relatively limited amount of resources and manpower that can be utilized within a limited area in Sakhalin means that the two situations are not comparable.
I would give the range for the second significant wave of migrants to be around 1,000-5,000, with the actual number closer to 2,500. Larger numbers potentially mean higher mortality rates, as the newcomers need to adjust, and there are not enough resources within the area to sustain such a high population. In addition, I already provided the potential ratio of soldiers to the rest of the population several times beforehand, so the combined total number of soldiers after the second migration would be around 500 at most, which wouldn't exactly be ideal for repelling a numerically superior force. As I stated earlier, the natives were vastly outnumbered when resisting the Japanese for so long, so considering the limited settlement(s), the area would be quickly destabilized by numerous raids soon after the second wave.
That is after different time periods as the Natives of Sakhalin had been under the Ming and Yuan previously and that experience prepared them for conflict with the Japanese. I this Scenario they've had no experience with an organized conquerer and military force. They will be less sucessful also there is another factor of diseases which impacted the population following Japanese occupation which would hit during the Balhaean occupation giving a better chance of success and making resistance more difficult.
The die off of about half the immigrated population was expected but not from simple migration as a much larger would have attempted to come but were unsucceessful. I put the number at about 6000 coming but only 3000 surviving after resources and conflict problems but your number is not much different.
The reason i gave for the number of 1200 as a military force was desperation, combining the immigrated group with the local soldiers and native loyalist also most of the migrants would be those who could make the trip which would be fewer children, women, and elderly therefore most being male. That is why assimilation was important as native wives would be a hall mark of Lesser Balhae. This would impact the language in time but we'll never know how as Balhaean hasn't survived till today.
China would undoubtedly send emassaries to the island nation but rarely. They and Japan might be the only proper sources of reference for Lesser Balhae of this i agree.
I will agree though had Balhae not fallen the settlements would have been abandoned but they fell at the height of the settlement which was not going to last. The settlement only survived and grew thanks to the limited number of women that came causing more marriages with the native women and aliances with several groups of natives. Once the Balhaeans had setteled in the south it became harder to dislodge them. The hostile natives were forced to mostly be in the harsh north which further reduced their ability to organize a fighting force as they were too busy trying to survive.
This is going to be my last post on this thread because I think that we're going in circles here at this point. To reiterate, I don't see anything wrong with trading links between the two, but substantial settlements will require a lot of resources to continuously maintain, which will be extremely difficult to manage in such an isolated environment.
Sorry to hear this i have enjoyed your post although i think you were taking the road of the worse case scenario. I appreciate your insights and would hope you bring your knowledge to other threads i start in the future.