WI: Kerensky Offensive succedes

As many of you know, in 1917, Alexander Kerensky, leader of the russian provincial government, organized an offensive to try and keep russia to it's Entnete Commitment.

Despite Initial Gains, the offensive failed, mainly due to the choas fermented by the bolsheviks, and low morale. But what if it had succeded? Could a Russian Battlefield Vicotry in 1917 prevented the bolsheviks from takign power?

Disscus.
 
It would certainly have made the interim government much stronger. And made the chances of the Bolsheviks to seize power disappear, at least for that moment.

But how do you make soldiers fight if they don't want to fight anymore????
 
As many of you know, in 1917, Alexander Kerensky, leader of the russian provincial government, organized an offensive to try and keep russia to it's Entnete Commitment.

Despite Initial Gains, the offensive failed, mainly due to the choas fermented by the bolsheviks, and low morale. But what if it had succeded? Could a Russian Battlefield Vicotry in 1917 prevented the bolsheviks from takign power?

Disscus.
You should really proofread before posting.
That is just atrocious.

As many of you know, in 1917, Alexander Kerensky, leader of the Russian provisional government, organized an offensive to try and keep Russia to its Entente commitment.

Despite initial gains, the offensive failed, mainly due to the chaos fermented by the Bolsheviks, and low morale. But what if it had succeeded? Could a Russian battlefield victory in 1917 prevented the Bolsheviks from taking power?

Discuss.
That's better.
 
Last edited:
Top