IOTL, the future Roman emperor Julian (mostly known for his Pagan religious sympathies) was sent to the empire's Rhenish frontier by Constantius II in 356 AD to deal with a large Germanic invasion, spearheaded by the Alemanni tribe. The Germans were executing numerous raids across Gaul, and there were whispers at the imperial court that Constantius had sent Julian there because he, a paranoid emperor, wanted to get rid of a possible rival to the throne.
Julian, however, managed to defeat the Alemanni in a decisive battle around Argentoratum (modern Estrasbourg, France). He was credited as a saviour of Gaul by his loyal troops, and went on to contest Constantius II's government as emperor. Before Constantius could fight back, he died, and Julian became sole ruler of the empire until his death at the hands of the Sassanian Persians, in 363 AD.
But, what if Julian had died at the hands of the Alemanni at Argentoratum?
I'd expect this defeat to open Gaul to massive Germanic raids, like what defeat at Adrianople did to the Balkans twenty-two years later. Plus, with no viable successor to Constantius II, the empire could fall to yet another civil war. Could we see an earlier Germanic invasion period?
 
With the PoD in 356, the pressure'll be on Constantius to sire a son before long, and to find a reasonable enough regent in the meantime, so he might keep trying for one with Eusebia. Eusebia can't act as regent if everything else goes as OTL due to her predeceasing Constanius in 360, so this is already going to be a big challenge.
 
With the PoD in 356, the pressure'll be on Constantius to sire a son before long, and to find a reasonable enough regent in the meantime, so he might keep trying for one with Eusebia. Eusebia can't act as regent if everything else goes as OTL due to her predeceasing Constanius in 360, so this is already going to be a big challenge.
IIRC, Constantius only had a daughter by another wife after Eusebia died. It seems the Constantinian dynasty is in trouble if Constantius still can't manage to sire an heir before dying.
 
What would a Germanic invasion period look like if the first breach in the dam was Gaul? What would happen to Britannia, not yet totally deprived of its armed forces and still a loyal part of Rome but now separated from it?

Also, Julian caused major social upheaval in the Empire with his attempt at re-establishing paganism as the main religion. How would Christianity have developed without this brief interruption?
 
What would a Germanic invasion period look like if the first breach in the dam was Gaul? What would happen to Britannia, not yet totally deprived of its armed forces and still a loyal part of Rome but now separated from it?
Most likely something similar to OTL, except some seven decades earlier, IMO. Still, enough differences to make it distinct from OTL.
Imagine if the Huns come by, and the Empire has already been mostly replaced by Barbarian kingdoms.
The migrating groups may also settle in different places.
Also, Julian caused major social upheaval in the Empire with his attempt at re-establishing paganism as the main religion. How would Christianity have developed without this brief interruption?
I think it'll depend on the policies of Constantius' successors.
Julian tried to play Arians and Catholics against each other, and the Arians got a small boost for a few years after his reign, until Theodosius came by. If Julian never gets the throne, then Arianism might not get this brief boost. This could have interesting consequences if the Germans manage to penetrate the western portions of the empire's borders -- can the Arian priesthood make an alliance with the Germanics?
 
Most likely something similar to OTL, except some seven decades earlier, IMO. Still, enough differences to make it distinct from OTL.
Imagine if the Huns come by, and the Empire has already been mostly replaced by Barbarian kingdoms.
The migrating groups may also settle in different places.

The Huns might have a better shot at establishing a longer-lasting “Hunnia,” even if it’s just a small region in another nation. I feel like this scenario might lead to even more chaos than OTL for a while.

For Britain, I agree that Roman Britain wouldn’t survive as it was but IMO the Britons might fare a little better against the Saxons. Maybe you wouldn’t see them pushed all the way back to modern Wales? Maybe more cultural (not linguistic, I know British Romance is doomed) continuity.

I think it'll depend on the policies of Constantius' successors.
Julian tried to play Arians and Catholics against each other, and the Arians got a small boost for a few years after his reign, until Theodosius came by. If Julian never gets the throne, then Arianism might not get this brief boost. This could have interesting consequences if the Germans manage to penetrate the western portions of the empire's borders -- can the Arian priesthood make an alliance with the Germanics?

The other possibility is Arianism never reaching its OTL prominence, which means that Catholicism becomes more dominant earlier on.
 
Bumping for interest.
Looking at tribal dispositions, it seems to me that the Alemanni would prefer invading Italy, while the Franks plunder Gaul.
 
Bumping for interest.
Looking at tribal dispositions, it seems to me that the Alemanni would prefer invading Italy, while the Franks plunder Gaul.

Apparently the Alemanni were pagan at this point, meaning that if they captured Italy it probably be more devastating to the region than the OTL Ostrogoths. On the other hand, they might convert straight to Nicene Christianity since it was the dominant popular faith, which strengthens their political standing in the long term.
 
Top