ThePest179
Banned
I heard about an incident in the Taliban's Afghanistan where 10 Iranian diplomats were killed and Iran almost went to war with the Taliban. What would've happened had Iran been more impulsive and attacked?
Two totalitarian Islamic 'Republics' (to abuse the term Republic) going at each other's throats? Oh this would be potentially even messier than the Iran-Pakistan nuclear exchange in World War Z.
The butterflies from this would be global, and that's just day one!![]()
Taliban Afghanistan was an Islamic Emirate.
The Talibans would be swept aside in weeks, and the Northern Alliance would take over, ruling in joint with the Iranian occupiers.
Pakistan start to fund a guerrilla war against Iran.
I'm thinking about international repercussions of the Iran-Afghan War and it's messy from day one.
On one hand, the Afghan's did kill a bunch of diplomats, on the other hand the situation could have been handled through negotiation, and Iran being Iran, a lot of countries would (clandestinely) support Afghanistan simply to do the Iranians a bad turn.
I'm picturing the United States sending 'advisors' to the Afghans along with a ton of cash and guns to fight Iran.
Not sure if Yeltsin would have the urge to wage a proxy war against the United States by supporting Iran, but there'd be factions within Russia that totally would.
China might send some supplies to Iran to gain influence (and maybe some oil), or it might split the difference and supply both sides.
al-Qaeda will decide that Shia Iran is it's worst enemy after all, pouring it's resources into a 'New Jihad', and I'm telling you that the CIA and Osama bin Ladin will become besties again, even if the US government publicly disavows any support for al-Qaeda (wink).
The Iran-Afghan War would have Iran putting more effort into it's nuclear program, and the rest of the world putting even more effort into stopping their nuclear program. Israel might 'act without American knowledge' (wink) and bomb Iran, Iraq of course denying that it had allowed the Israelis into their airspace (wink).
That is if Saddam wasn't given a free hand (and a bunch of cash and weapons) to re-invade Iran again.
Yeah... This thing could have turned the Middle East into just a big a mess as it's turned into due to the OTL Iraq War.
It ends the same way it does for anyone who has ever invaded Afghanistan. Badly.
Now for some wild cards.
1. Iran's Nuclear Program, would they decide to invest more into it? Scrap it in favor of spending more money on conventional weapons?
2. Saddam in Iraq. Would he want to reinvade Iran again? Start talking with America for weapons and cash to make that invasion a reality? Supply the Taliban in a proxy war with Iran instead?
3. Israel, would they offer aid to the Taliban (would the Taliban take that aid), would they if Iran hit the accelerator on their nuclear program decide to bomb Iran? Would America let them or would they go it alone?
4. Russia. Yeltsin himself wouldn't do much, but the people around him might be convinced to support Iran in a proxy war against America. Or at the least to gain influence in the region. So would Yeltsin listen to them or to the Americans? Or would he just get drunk?
5. The Iranian People, with the war dragging on without long-term results, there'd be protests and an anti-war movement, but what would it accomplish? Nothing like the Green Revolution in OTL? A successful overthrow of the government? If that then would it lead to a peaceful transition to democracy? A new dictatorship? A civil war? A new monarchy? A different Islamist government?
The Mongols, Greeks, Indians all want a word with you.
Also has the latest war really gone all that badly? It hasn't achieved much but the Taliban have lost a lot and probably will take years even decades to fully recover if they ever do. I know its unpopular and a horrendous waste of money but it hasn't come close to Soviet or British Empire invasion level clusterfucks.
I doubt Yeltsin would do much besides get drunk and put it off, Putin is the real wild card here, considering his ant-West rhetoric didn't get serious until after several years of his rule. Israel can't bomb Iran because of the long bomber range (which is part of why they haven't yet). Considering that the OTL Iranian nuclear hasn't produced any nuclear weapons, I doubt more "effort" put into it would help much. Iraq and the anti-war movement are the real wild cards, and we have no idea what will happen in the future with the Taliban, Al-Qaeda, and if there would ever be a War on Terror.
Is it that big a waste? As long as the US Army is there AQ can't make it a sanctuary as before 9/11.
Long-term I see China-Iran relations being very much improved, and if/when Putin took over Russia I could see him cozying up to Iran as well. IF and only if the Islamic Republic is still in charge.
You know if this happens before the US Cole bombing, the CIA might wind up becoming besties with Osama bin Ladin all over again.
I think the Islamic theocracy we see standing would likely remain. Of course, I'm not exactly one to know. I would THINK that the anti-war movement would face the persecution of the US anti-Vietnam War movement times ten, but I have no idea if it would strike back or be crushed. One thing is certain though: Iran would eventually pull out, but the when is an elusive question.