IOTL, in a period between December 2001 and June 2002, there was an uncomfortable escalation of tensions between the governments of India and Pakistan, after an incident involving a terrorist attack on the Indian Parliament which left 12 dead. India claimed that Pakistan's intelligence service was involved in this attack, and also blamed pro-Pakistani insurgents in Kashmir. Both countries began mobilizing their armies, but what most worried observers compared to the three previous Indo-Pakistani wars was the fact that both India and Pakistan now possessed nuclear weapons. Eventually, both countries managed to reach a peaceful resolution to the issue, and cooler heads prevailed.
But what if India or Pakistan had decided to go to war in the midst of the crisis?
Who would be more likely to win this conflict?
How does the Afghan theater of Bush's War on Terror end up playing out if Pakistan is getting bombed by India?
But what if India or Pakistan had decided to go to war in the midst of the crisis?
Who would be more likely to win this conflict?
How does the Afghan theater of Bush's War on Terror end up playing out if Pakistan is getting bombed by India?