This isn't what you think, I'm thinking of an alternate Japan that doesn't go down the path to war with the West, but that's not my point.
How would the demographics/economics of Hiroshima and Nagasaki be different without the atomic bombs? Nagasaki never really reached the importance it had before being bombed, so would it remain the main Japanese port in the south?
Also, there is no Korean War for Japan to be a launching point for, so does that mean there this alternate (mildly) peaceful Japan gets no post-war boom?
How would the demographics/economics of Hiroshima and Nagasaki be different without the atomic bombs? Nagasaki never really reached the importance it had before being bombed, so would it remain the main Japanese port in the south?
Also, there is no Korean War for Japan to be a launching point for, so does that mean there this alternate (mildly) peaceful Japan gets no post-war boom?