WI Henry Stuart Duke of Gloucester lives longer?

In 1659 King Charles II created his younger brother Henry Duke of Gloucester and Earl of Cambridge , but in OTL he died suddenly of smallpox the next year, much to his brother's distress. Decades later, during the exclusion crisis, Henry was looked back on as a kind of 'lost leader'; as what might have been a legitimate, warlike, Protestant alternat the equally unpalatable choices of the James Stuart Duke of York (who became King James II in OTL) and James Scott 1st Duke of Monmouth (bastard son of King Charles II)
WI Henry had lived longer? Would he become King Henry IX after Charles's II death? Or Glorious revolution still occurs but instead of William III and Mary II we have King Henry IX?
How is this altering History? Any thoughts?
 
Off topic, but I find the possibility of him being emplaced as an early constitutional monarch of a radical Leveller influences state interesting as well.
 
Top