WI Gundobad restored Glycerius as Western Emperor in 473 AD?

In 473 Glycerius though managed to persuade Ostrogoths by use of diplomacy rather than force, to move into Gaul instead of Italy. But now Emperor Leo I, unwilling to accept Glycerius, whom he saw as a usurper on the western throne, sent forward Julius Nepos with a fleet in order to overthrow him. Nepos landed at Portus Augusti and there, as agreed with Leo, declared himself western emperor. At the key moment when Glycerius needed Gundobad, his powerful Magister Militum, Gundobad left Italy. Gundobad fought and killed his three brothers, Godegisel, Chilperic II and Gundomar, to become his father's sole heir to the Kingdom of Burgundy. With Gundobad gone, and no other obvious support, Glycerius simply surrendered to Julius Nepos without a fight.
WI Gundobad returned with a Burgundian army ousting Julius Nepos restoring Glycerius?
How is this altering History? Any thoughts?
 
Erm...I think for most of us you need to explain this a bit more

Else, you get a half answer from people

Where does the OTL sacking of Rome fit into this chronology ?

And the other Constantine who came from Britain ?

Best Regards
Grey Wolf
 
Erm...I think for most of us you need to explain this a bit more

Else, you get a half answer from people

Where does the OTL sacking of Rome fit into this chronology ?

And the other Constantine who came from Britain ?

Best Regards
Grey Wolf

If i recall correctly sacking of Rome happened in 410 AD and 455 AD... Constantine III came in 408 AD from Britain... But how are all these connected to Glycerius being restored in 473 AD???
 

yourworstnightmare

Banned
Donor
Would the Burgundians have any chances to stay though, I mean their kingdom was surrounded by Franks and Allemannians, and neither of them could be trusted. I can eaily see Gundobad leaving Italy with his troops again, and Glycerus just being deposed once again.
 
Top