The problem here is that KKE sided with Stalin in the Tito-Stalin split, and for that to be butterflied away, you have to prevent Zachariadis from becoming KKE's secretary-general (he defined KKE as a firmly stalinist party).
So there's the POD. Is there anyone else besides Zachariadis who could lead the KKE and be friendly to Tito?
But yes, this would be a very interesting scenario, especially how the economy would go.
Oh, definitely. Who knows, Greece just
might be better off in the long run in TTL.
Oh no-no-no-no-no, the Katharevousa is never supposed to change in the slightest, even if it's adopted by the Greek-Congolese community's institutions or sth!
But of course.

However, it should be noted that in Cyprus Katharevousa was the main orthography with no competition from Dimotiki, in large part because Katharevousa proved to be a natural fit for Cypriot Greek as Cypriot preserves quite a few archaisms. This would also be true of the spoken variety in the Dodecanese as well (this argument breaks down once we get to Cretan). Hence, for spoken Katharevousa (as opposed to written Katharevousa, which will remain the same regardless

) the only changes are minor and would basically be:
>The replacement of OTL SMG palatal sounds [c], [ɟ], [ç], [ʝ] (preserved in the SMG in Communist Greece) with alveolo-palatal sounds [tɕ], [dʑ], [ɕ], [ʑ] (as in Crete). They are still treated as allophones of the velars /k/, /ɡ/, /x/, /ɣ/.
>The preservation of geminate consonants as written in Katharevousa and word-final /n/, both of which are lost in SMG in OTL and in the SMG in Communist Greece in TTL. (a concession to the SE dialects).
>No change of <-ía, éa> > /ja/ (as in SMG in OTL and in the SMG in Communist Greece in TTL), so παιδία /pe'ði.a/ instead of παιδιά /pe'ðja/ (note the placement of the tonos).
Minor stuff, really.
I can see Dodecanese and Crete becoming a 'Kingdom of Greece' but it would be little more than a UK/US satellite. Maybe sometime in the 50s-70s Cyprus would be attached to it, as the state would effectively be a network of bases for NATO. (Souda/Chania, Maritsa/Rhodes, Akrotiri,Nicosia/Cyprus) and it would be one of the most reliable ally for the western powers, contrary to OTL '63-'67 Greece.
Exactement.

Of course it would be little more than a UK/US satellite - that's the whole point, right? I also agree on the Kingdom on being one of the more reliable allies in TTL, though like in OTL I would expect corruption and dynastic politics to abound like crazy, amongst other things. Of course this means that the military in TTL will be THE biggest driver of the Greek economy, along with agriculture, shipping, and this time tourism in a big way. That's because apart from that, there's really precious little to grow the economy with, even if you put light industry up in Crete, so emigration will again be a fact of like in the Kingdom. It would be interesting to see if the Kingdom of Greece in TTL maintain/expand/build upon the foundation left by Italian rule in the Dodecanese, obviously.
Though Cyprus I'm not too sure about - I'm sure that in TTL Britain would be loath to give up Cyprus as it's in a perfect strategic location for HM Forces and the RAF and Royal Navy in particular. What it could potentially offer Cyprus, IMO, would be Dominion status within the British Empire, with the Sovereign Base Areas remaining separate from Cyprus.
The problem is, Crete was the most liberal region of Greece at the time, while the Dodecanese was one of the most conservatist and rightist. Moreover, the government-in-exile was created by and based on liberal parties with very strong roots and support in Crete, but once they united and, along with other politicians, created the Centre Union and won the election, the King wouldn't let them govern. The King, in turn, was OTL and would be ITTL very popular in the Dodecanese. An equivalent of the Apostasia ITTL may lead as far as a breakup of the Kingdom, because the division would be even deeper and very localy/regionaly-defined. That's also some food for thought.
Oh definitely - the political tensions are going to exacerbate things greatly, no doubt about it. So the politicos are going to have to scramble to find ways of uniting the two regions together, and a big one is going to be a revival of the Megali Idea (which I'm sure Communist Greece would disavow, for obvious reasons rooted in WW1 and the Asia Minor incident) which would not only include those areas of Greece under the control of the KKE, but potentially even Northern Epirus, Cyprus (though, as I already mentioned, Britain would refuse to give that up), and even those areas of Turkey that Greece administered pre-Turkish War of Independence (i.e. Eastern Thrace, Imbros and Tenedos, and Ionia) and expanded. The Turkish bit, however, would only be for domestic consumption only and not played up too much since both the Kingdom and Turkey are NATO members, but the other areas would be mentioned for both domestic and international consumption. Though even then I don't think the Megali Idea would be enough, so it would be possible for the Kingdom to be prone to military coups. An Apostasia analogue would threaten to break up the Kingdom, yes, but it would probably be certain that NATO would want the entire Kingdom to be maintained as one piece, in part due to potential concern of Crete joining with the Communists if they broke away (never underestimate Cold War hysteria). An EDA analogue in the Kingdom, if one is formed, would only heighten the tensions even further.
Interesting how specific the orthography you mentioned was.
Well, I'd figure that the choice of written language would define a major difference between Communist Greece and the Kingdom of Greece, amongst other things, so in this case the devil is in the details. Communist Greece's adoption of Dimotiki is in part rooted in a resolution of the EAM/ELAS's Political Committee of National Liberation (Πολιτική Επιτροπή Εθνικής Απελευθέρωσης), which states that "the People's language is the formal language for all manifestations of public life and for all educational grades." It would also in part be based on a certain little book which called for Dimotiki as the official language of Greece, as mentioned in English Wiki:
Wiki said:
In 1902 Fotis Fotiadis, personal physician to the Ottoman Sultan (and therefore secure enough to risk controversy) published The Language Question and our Educational Renaissance, the first book to argue for educational reform based on demotic. Claiming that it was easier for a Greek child to learn a foreign language than katharevousa, he called for demotic to be established as the official language of the Greek state, education, and law.
Writing as a doctor and a father, he presented a child's view of contemporary Greek education: from the start, the pupils are told that they have been using the 'wrong' language, and are made to spend much of their time simply learning new 'correct' katharevousa words and expressions. As a result " ... their minds become confused and disordered, and they are unable to do anything in a natural manner, instead becoming self-conscious and hesitant, not only in their linguistic expression but in everything else they do". He argued for more than simply switching to demotic: he believed that self-development should be the priority in education, and that national self-awareness would follow. To encourage this, he urged that "national poetry" and "popular music" (meaning rural demotic folk poetry and folk music), which reveal the "soul of the people", should become an essential part of the curriculum.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_...E2.80.9322_Demoticism_in_education_and_reform
That would appeal quite nicely to the KKE, as you can quite imagine. However, the Standard Modern Greek of Communist Greece would not be straight Dimotiki, but as in OTL basically Dimotiki enriched by Katharevousa - the "best of both worlds", as one academic put it. This SMG would also be pretty open to loanwords, so many of the old loanwords popularly used before the arrival of Katharevousa would be used again - and with Yugoslavia a major ally of Communist Greece, Serbo-Croatian loanwords would also be found in abundance, sometimes alongside a native Greek equivalent (i.e.
samoupravljanje <σαμοϋπραυλιανιε> "self-management", with its equivalent in SMG). The Kingdom of Greece, obviously, would use Katharevousa, but as the language question hadn't largely been settled by this time there would probably be some challenge to it even as it phonologically kinda sorta fits the SE dialects better.
As for the orthography itself, well I mentioned how SMG in Communist Greece is mildly reformed vis-à-vis representation of the /u/ sound (which due to the orthographic reform is now either <υι> or <ι>, which Katharevousa avoids). There is, however, one other minor orthographic detail which would provide a major difference, and that is the use of diacritics. As already stated, the monotonic orthography is not adopted in TTL by Communist Greece, leaving us with SMG in polytonic, though monotonic would probably be in use by a minority. However, it would be conceivable for Communist Greece to adopt a simplified polytonic orthography, where:
- There are only two accents: the acute <´> and the circumflex <˜>; the grave is abolished and replaced by the acute. A minority of Greeks will use the acute exclusively and thus follow the monotonic orthography. The acute can take the form of the modern acute accent or a vertical bar or a dot, depending on personal preference, but all official texts, most printed text, and works published by the Orthodox Church use the acute accent. The circumflex always takes the form of the tilde.
- The breathings are not written over <ρ> or <υ>, the latter because only the rough breathing occurred over old <υ> which is no longer pronounced as such in reformed orthography so is not needed. The coronis, however, remains.
- The iota subscript is abolished. When used in religious texts (such as those published by the Orthodox Church) or when discussing Ancient Greek, however, the iota subscript is always used and never the iota adscript of Western practice.
- There are also a few modifications peculiar to Communist Greece, one of which would seem strange to both Greeks and non-Greeks but which has precedent in the history of Greek typesetting. As such, the accents are placed on top of capital letters instead of on the side (as in OTL), and sigma <Σ, σ/ς> is replaced with its lunate form <C, c>.
With the Kingdom of Greece, however, the full traditional system is still in force, including putting accents to the side of capital letters, the grave accent, breathings on rho and upsilon, and the use of the non-lunate sigma, as in OTL. The Kingdom may also be more amenable to using the iota adscript in secular texts. The Orthodox Church also uses the full traditional system, though in Communist Greece the Orthodox Church places the accents on top of capital letters whilst the Orthodox Church in the Kingdom and Mount Athos uses OTL practice; all, however, exclusively use the iota subscript.
That should take care of the orthography stuff. Quite detailed, yes, but it has to be both because of the nature of the language question (which now takes on a Cold War aspect) and because certain forms of written Modern Greek are being used to differentiate one from another. I was thinking of adding additional contextual forms of letters as an analogue to the contextual forms of sigma (most of which have precedent in the history of Greek typography, such as for beta), but then I figured that the Communists would not want to make the orthography more needlessly complicated then it already is, so I eliminated the OTL sigma with its contextual forms and replaced it with the one historical form which just coincidentally also happens to be the standard form of /s/ in the Cyrillic script (as Cyrillic <C, c> descends from the Greek lunate sigma).
Yeah, Italy would be a very long shot, I just mentioned it as a talking point.
I might write a TL someday about post-2008 Greece, but a Communist Greece OTL would be difficult to do, IMO.
Of course, on both counts. A Communist Greece TL, however, would be very interesting to write simply because can get to play around with how Communist Greece is organized and developed.
Greece had rail, naval and air infrastructure already in place, the situation in Albania was worse in that respect. Also, Albania effectively stopped being a USSR ally too soon for anyone to see Soviet intentions or lack thereof to develop bases in Albania.
Definitely. With Titoism completely surrounding Albania, Tirana is probably going to be more paranoid.