WI Germany made more responsible decisions regarding manpower distribution?

We all know the Nazis had nutzy priorities, and that caused them to spread themselves thin in the Second World War Two. How much better would they have fared if...

1. They got over their sexism and let women work in munitions factories while the men went out and fought people?

2. They realized the Final Solution was a waste of manpower and resources?

Additionally, a friend of mine once brought up how the Mongols usually wore down enemies by sending in slave soldiers to waste their strength down, then, when the enemy has only just finished off said slaves, the real Mongols would come in and ravage them. So, if you pardon the rather cruel question I am about to pose? What if they gave the targets of the Holocaust some meager training and promised them freedom if they charged forwards on the Russian Front to soak up the Red Army's bullets so the Germans would have fewer being fired at them?

Any other ideas on what the Germans could have done to spare a few more men for their evil conquest of evil?
 
If German women work in the factories, fewer slave laborers would be needed. I suspect clogging up the rail network and monopolizing rolling stock was a bigger drain on Germany's war effort than the manpower issue (camp guards were probably not the best quality troops;).)
 
Why do people constantly make threads about how to better Nazi Germany? i find it disgusting that so many people try to find any way that Hitler could win.
Anyway, there is no way that Germany could have won WWII. For the reasons that their plan from the beginning didn't take into account the US. Most of their occupation strategy was based on their non-existent racial superiority. And last but not least there is no way in hell the Soviets would be on the losing side, due to sheer numbers. After the battle of Kursk the Red Army lost almost two million men, but even after the largest battle in history barely a dent was put in the Russians.
 
Why do people constantly make threads about how to better Nazi Germany? i find it disgusting that so many people try to find any way that Hitler could win.
Anyway, there is no way that Germany could have won WWII. For the reasons that their plan from the beginning didn't take into account the US. Most of their occupation strategy was based on their non-existent racial superiority. And last but not least there is no way in hell the Soviets would be on the losing side, due to sheer numbers. After the battle of Kursk the Red Army lost almost two million men, but even after the largest battle in history barely a dent was put in the Russians.

After all the Soviets had over 4 billion men and armies of tanks numbering in the millions.
 
Why do people constantly make threads about how to better Nazi Germany? i find it disgusting that so many people try to find any way that Hitler could win.
It is called Alternate History. People will ask "What is the Nazis did better/won?" because, the Nazi's were undeniable bad guys. Honestly, do the majority of people that ask "How can the CSA win?" support the CSA becoming Independent and wanted it to happen? Of course not. The fact is people will ask "what is x side won in iconic wars in their History", because they think that will produce a much more different and therefore interesting, Historical developments.
Anyway, there is no way that Germany could have won WWII. For the reasons that their plan from the beginning didn't take into account the US. Most of their occupation strategy was based on their non-existent racial superiority. And last but not least there is no way in hell the Soviets would be on the losing side, due to sheer numbers. After the battle of Kursk the Red Army lost almost two million men, but even after the largest battle in history barely a dent was put in the Russians.
I doubt the Russians lost 2 Million Men at Kursk, considering as far as I know, they only had about 2 Million Troops in the battle as a whole.

I will like to say that, I am of the camp of people who think the Germans were very lucky to get as far as they did.
 
Additionally, a friend of mine once brought up how the Mongols usually wore down enemies by sending in slave soldiers to waste their strength down, then, when the enemy has only just finished off said slaves, the real Mongols would come in and ravage them. So, if you pardon the rather cruel question I am about to pose? What if they gave the targets of the Holocaust some meager training and promised them freedom if they charged forwards on the Russian Front to soak up the Red Army's bullets so the Germans would have fewer being fired at them?

Probably because doing that would deprive the Fuehrer and company of the emotional satisfaction they would have got with mass murder and the feeling of helplessness in the camps.
 
Having more women in the factories simply makes the farming sector collapse.
Its a myth that Germany had this huge pool of unused female labour. They used foreign workers and slave labour because they had no other choice
 
Top