Let's say that Margaret Thatcher continues on as Prime Minister after 1990, and that some of the problems which bogged her during her third term are butterflied away (for example, no Black Wednesday and perhaps somehow there is a better reception to the community charge, or it is never introduced at all), thereby allowing Thatcher to defeat Kinnock and Labour in either 1991 or 1992 (personally, I believe it would be 1991, due to a poll boost which would come about as a result of the Gulf War and Thatcher's tendency for four-term Parliaments), providing the Conservatives with a fourth term in Government under her leadership.
My question is this: how would Mrs. Thatcher approach the events which occurred in Britain during the 90s? It was quite clear that she was opposed to further integration with Europe, so could a Thatcher Government's opposition to the Maastricht Treaty lead to Brexit twenty-four years earlier? Would Britain's response to the break-up of Yugoslavia be different to our timeline? Also, who would succeed Mrs. Thatcher as Prime Minister (IIRC, in The Downing Street Years, she said she would resign in either 1993 or 1994), and could they defeat Labour in 1996/97?
My question is this: how would Mrs. Thatcher approach the events which occurred in Britain during the 90s? It was quite clear that she was opposed to further integration with Europe, so could a Thatcher Government's opposition to the Maastricht Treaty lead to Brexit twenty-four years earlier? Would Britain's response to the break-up of Yugoslavia be different to our timeline? Also, who would succeed Mrs. Thatcher as Prime Minister (IIRC, in The Downing Street Years, she said she would resign in either 1993 or 1994), and could they defeat Labour in 1996/97?