It depends what you mean by victory.
If you meant English kings enforcing their claims to the French throne, then it would be really hard : the only realistic PoD I could think of would be Henry V living on, while Charles VII and his son would timely die at Bourges. It would make Henry the sole clear successors, as the next in line to French throne in Valois dynasty would have been Louis of Orléans, then hostage in England.
The Armagnac and Armagnac-sided nobility, while still powerful, would be more or less headless and eventually probably acknowledging Lancaster's suzerainty in exchange of a relative independence of French nobilities south of Loire.
Of course,
such situation would leave Burgundy with a large influence in Northern France, that would be directly detrimental to French interests : the Lancaster-Valois-Burgundy alliance was souple at best, and could entierly disappear if Lancasters wanted to affirm further their rights in France, of if Burgundy decided they could do without Lancasters or even claim the throne.
At this point, the Lancaster personal union cease to be England, as other said : would it be on demographical grounds the difference between England ( 2,5 millions) and France (16 millions) let little doubt : the double-monarchy would be for England what act of Union was for Scotland, not to mention the economical disprency or the cultural domination 'favoured by what remains of Anglo-Norman features in England).
Other than this PoD, I don't think it was really winnable for England : the war of attrition clearly favoured a wealthy France that benefited from more finely tuned fiscal and military resources than an England that was plagued by a Parliment that required the king to make fructuous campaign at little cost.
It was the reason why most Plantagenêts (directs of Lancasters) rather searched something along independence from french suzerainty on the continent.
It's basically the core of the Treaty of Brétigny (where the super-Aquitaine was technically a proper holding of England, or rather the Prince of Wales),
what might have happened if Edward survived longer and what might have been attempted in the XVth century
if Thomas Lancaster became king instead of Henry V, creating a new Aquitain principalty benefiting from Armagnac-Bourguignon civil war.
The thing was that Valois never saw these treaties or concessions anything but temporary repsites, a way to gather their forces before taking these back : IOTL Charles V, after a time, just resumed to treat Aquitaine like it was still under his suzerainty (even if it was kinda not according Brétigny*), helping Gascon lords that complained about Edward's increasing fiscal pressure. With Plantagenet complaining, he basically answered that the treaty was never enforced, and declared war on Plantagenets for being bad vassals.
That's how much he cared for Brétigny, and how Valois would eventually go : "lol, gtfo n00b" that it would have been the same. It's more or less the textbook exemple of Capetian/Plantagenêts conflcits and how they began anew since the XIIth century.
*Technically, the treaty was never applied soooo....