WI Emperor Constans II moved Byzantine Capital back to Rome?

In 663 AD Emperor Constans II visited Rome for 12 days (no emperor having set foot in Rome for two centuries) and was received with great honor by Pope Vitalian.
His subsequent moves in Calabria and Sardinia were marked by building strippings and request of tributes that enraged his Italian subjects. Eventually he set up his court in Syracusae and many Historians tend to believe that he was going to move his capital there... However he was strangled in his bath in Syracusae by a servant on 15 September 668...
WI Constans II wished to relocate his Capital to Rome instead of Syracusae? How is this altering History? Any thoughts?
 
Last edited:
The population of Constantinople rises in revolt, easily swayed by an ambitious aristocrat to support him. Cue new civil war, that can go either way depending on whether the Roman army in Italy supports Constans or not.

The Arabs take advantage of the situation to extend their gains; if they attack Sicily first they could be an influential factor in the defeat of Constans.

At the time future Constantine IV was only 11 years old, and as precocious as he was, he would not have survived long. And so the Heraclian dynasty would have ended ahead of schedule.
 
Well a rebellion would be certain if he moved officially the capital but unofficialy he could move his HQ in Rome... He had secured a peace treaty with the Arabs in 659 so he could deal with Lombards effectively in Italy... Romuald I Duke of Benevento was reducing Byzantine influence quickly by capturing Tarentum and Brundisium... In the long run (should he avoided the assassination attempt) could launch an attack against Visigoths in a new Reconquista...
 
Top