Fairly simple idea here:
What if the British East India Company, instead of giving its territories to the Crown in 1858, kept them, remaining master of India?
Could they last?
What would the effect be on every other country?
Would there ever be a need for "decolonization", seeing as it, technically, was not a country, and thus, not a European country?
What if the British East India Company, instead of giving its territories to the Crown in 1858, kept them, remaining master of India?
Could they last?
What would the effect be on every other country?
Would there ever be a need for "decolonization", seeing as it, technically, was not a country, and thus, not a European country?