WI: D-Day fails due to weather

On June fifth their was a storm hitting Normandy, Captain J.M Stagg made a famous prediction that the storm would let up by the next day and allow the landings to proceed as normal which it did. But what if the storm had continued to June 6th? I'm thinking of making this into a short scenario and could use some help with questioned answered, I'd be making one for each possibility.

Would Eisenhower have called back the invasion (in which case the Germans would know where the landings would be)?
When and where would the best location be then for another attempt?

If Eisenhower went with the landings how likely would they have been to succeed?
If they failed what would the political and military consequences be?
Could the failure bring the end to the Soviet-Allied alliance?
 
Eisenhower resigns. The Soviets still push into Berlin in Spring 1945 on their own merit and control all of Germany, not just the eastern end. The western Allies attempt liberate France from their land points in Italy and through the Alps instead. It takes longer but eventually is secured. Victory happens either way.
 
On June fifth their was a storm hitting Normandy, Captain J.M Stagg made a famous prediction that the storm would let up by the next day and allow the landings to proceed as normal which it did. But what if the storm had continued to June 6th? I'm thinking of making this into a short scenario and could use some help with questioned answered, I'd be making one for each possibility.

Would Eisenhower have called back the invasion (in which case the Germans would know where the landings would be)?
When and where would the best location be then for another attempt?

If Eisenhower went with the landings how likely would they have been to succeed?
If they failed what would the political and military consequences be?
Could the failure bring the end to the Soviet-Allied alliance?

The major impact of the storm would have been low cloud which would have eliminated much air support, and possibly spotter aircraft for naval gunfire.

DD tanks would have been taken to shore in landing craft and not launched at sea.

The troops may have been seasick but the landings could still have taken place - IIRC Montgomery was prepared to land on June 5, and 3rd Division history records how they had practiced in far worse sea conditions in Scotland over the winter. There would have been more disruption to the landings (landing in the wrong place or order and vessels lost) but the Allies would still have got ashore, and would have untangled themselves during the better weather on the 6th.

If Eisenhower decided not to go on the 6th, then vessels would have to return to port for refuelling and the invasion delayed for 2 weeks to the next set of suitable tides. This in OTL had an even worse storm.
 
Last edited:
On June fifth their was a storm hitting Normandy, Captain J.M Stagg made a famous prediction that the storm would let up by the next day and allow the landings to proceed as normal which it did. But what if the storm had continued to June 6th? I'm thinking of making this into a short scenario and could use some help with questioned answered, I'd be making one for each possibility.

It was not something that Stagg pulled out of his hat, though. He had good indicators that the storm will calm down. The Allies spent years looking at weather patterns over North Atlantic and developed pretty good understanding of it. They were aware that the storm of late June was coming, but they underestimated its severity.

Besides, the weather was constantly observed during the embarkation and assembly of the ships and if it deteriorated seriously the landing would have been called off and would happen a day later, or however long it took. There just wasn't much possibility for Overlord to fail. Multiple things would have to go all the way wrong and that had such a low chance of actually happening that the chance of D-Day failing due to any single factor and chance of multiple factors occurring are approaching zero.
 
If Eisenhower went with the landings how likely would they have been to succeed?
If they failed what would the political and military consequences be?
Could the failure bring the end to the Soviet-Allied alliance?

1) probably still work even if more allied casualties.

2) Eisenhower resigns another invasion later works.

3) NO - why would it ? nether side will make peace short of total victory so they are forced to be co-belligerents and might as well help each other. (and LL is a huge deal as well)
 
Top