WI: Cult of Cybernetics never ends in the USSR

During the 60s and 70s cybernetics played a very important role in Soviet Union, to the point at which it attempted to subsume practically all of soviet science. Cybernetics was perfectly compatible with marxist-leninist ideology and the culture of progress. Automation was seen as a step towards communism and post-scarity economics.

During Khrushchev's relaxation of scientific culture, the Council on Cybernetics served as an umbrella organisation for formerly suppressed research, including such subjects as non-Pavlovian physiology ("physiological cybernetics"), structural linguistics ("cybernetic linguistics"), and Lamarckist genetics ("biological cybernetics"). During the 60s, cybernetics entered the soviet mainstream. Pro-cybernetic programmes appeared in Soviet media with 20-minute radio broadcasts, entitled "Cybernetics in Our Lives", a series of broadcasts on Moscow TV, detailing advances in computer technology, alongside hundreds of lectures before various party members and workers on cybernetics. In 1961 the 22. Party Congress of the CPSU decleared cybernetics to be one of the "major tools of the creation of a communist society". Khrushchev declared the development of cybernetics to be an "imperative" in Soviet science. This put cybernetics "in fashion" as many career-minded scientists began using 'cybernetics' as a buzzword and the movement swelled with its new membership.

However, the tactical uses of "cyberspeak" eventually overshadowed the original reformist goals that aspired the first Soviet cyberneticians. The ideas which were once seen as controversial, and huddled under the umbrella organisation of cybernetics, now entered the scientific mainstream, leaving cybernetics as a loose and incoherent ideological patchwork. Some cyberneticians, whose dissident styles had been sheltered by the cybernetics movement, now felt themselves persecuted; cyberneticians such as Valentin Turchin, Alexander Lerner, and Igor Mel'čuk felt the need to immigrate to escape this newfound scientific atmosphere. By the 1980s, cybernetics had lost its cultural relevance.

However, what if it didn't? What if cybernetics remained part of the soviet mainstream? On the contrary, what if cybernetics became even more important, with programs like OGAS (a soviet prototype to the internet, that was meant to automate and streamline economic planning) beeing implemented? In this scenario, the USSR wouldn't have neglected, but offensively embraced the scientific-technical revolution. What implications would this have had on soviet science, culture and society as a whole? How would this affect the Cold War, the other socialist nations and the capitalist camp?

And, last but not least, how can it be done?

Bonus points if there is a revival of constructivist art and architecture (which's esthetics were also directed towards science and progress).
 
What kind of outcomes are we looking for?

Keynes with a water clock economic calculator with more fish tanks?
A non-moribund nomenklatura controlled Fordist compromise capitalism?
Post-fordist "micro-labour" flexibilised social-transactions under nomenklatura control ("Uberised" time and motion).
Brezhnev toppled by Dubček supporting cyberneticist communisers equally interested in sausage maximisation and labour elimination under workers control?

I feel that a willingness to produce the post-Fordist capital goods demanded by cybernetics such as integrated open communication and computation networks with flow-centric analyses will necessarily problematise the capital-labour-geographic Fordism of the soviet union. And out of the managers of capital and the slaves of capital, only one class will benefit. And without Dubček, they're just going to wait until a quiet sausage is more important than taking control of production back. And 1968 seems to be the last gasp there, both for the nomenklatura and proletariat.

Wait until 1980 and people are just going to relax with their sausage, apartment, and place in the car queue. Meanwhile the bosses sell the canteen and gymnaseum and company out from under the workers. Cyberneticists aren't going to have the social ha capital in a nomenklatura society as moribund as the Soviet Union in the 1960s unless something big happens. 59 in China, 68 in China, 72 in China weren't big. 68 in Czechoslovakia was big for the soviet elite.

It is a matter of finding out, who, between January and August said, "Damn, those Czechoslovaks have some good ideas," and link them into Cybernetics, and a sufficiently large faction that realises that Brezhnevian capital-goods non-replacement is basically dooming them to be Britain to Germany, or America to Japan in terms of Fordism being eaten by varieties of post-Fordism.

yours,
Sam R.
 
Top