As we all knew, Charles I of England wasn't the best king in history. In fact, he failed miserably in almost anything, and become a first king executed by his own people. He didn't aquired anything remarkable, he wasn't handosme, he wasn't to skilled in politic, he didn't support his most skilled mens.
However, let's just say that king James I & VI was more lucky, and his second son was made from "better material". He is far more taller, more physically attractive, more inteligent and can't be dominated so easily. Also he is more skilled tactician and politic, also charismatic leader with strong will. However, he still belives in his divine right to rule and still seems to al least accept Catholics.
Any chance that more skilled ruler with identical belives could beign a better king for England in this hard times? Is tactical sense and charisma is enough to crash Puritans and Parlament at least for a while?