WI: Charles I Louis of the Palatinate has a 2nd legitimate son

I'm on a string of alt-British succession possibilities recently, so here's another one, (that should also change up continental politics).

Charles I Louis of the Palatinate had a rather messed-up personal life; rather prone to bigamy, as a result only 3 of his 18 children were legitimate. His only subsequent legitimate descendants were through his female Catholic daughter, which meant both that the Palatinate had a succession crisis (and was eventually inherited by a distant cadet branch) and also that the Act of Settlement gave the British throne to descendants of his younger sister, Sophia of Hanover.

But it occurred to me that for lack of his hated wife Charlotte of Hesse-Kassel, the bigamy issue and subsequent succession dilemmas would go away. Namely, lets say Charlotte passes away 7 years earlier in 1679. This makes Charles I Louis' second bigamous marriage in OTL (to Elizabeth Hollander Von Bernau) perfectly valid as far as I can tell (why should it matter that he had two wives in the past when neither are alive now?) and as a result his OTL son Charles Louis born in 1681 should be legitimate and therefore succeed his brother as Charles II Louis of the Palatinate in 1685 (as a four year old). Come 1701 and we have Charles II Louis as the now adult Protestant ruler of the Palatinate with a very good claim to the British Throne. He has every likelihood to be chosen for the Act of Settlement (with pressure to get heirs of course.

Speculation on who Charles is likely to marry, how his reign affected the Nine Years War, or the effects of Britain getting a young Wittelsbach ruler instead of the 54 year old George I?
 
I'm on a string of alt-British succession possibilities recently, so here's another one, (that should also change up continental politics).

Charles I Louis of the Palatinate had a rather messed-up personal life; rather prone to bigamy, as a result only 3 of his 18 children were legitimate. His only subsequent legitimate descendants were through his female Catholic daughter, which meant both that the Palatinate had a succession crisis (and was eventually inherited by a distant cadet branch) and also that the Act of Settlement gave the British throne to descendants of his younger sister, Sophia of Hanover.

But it occurred to me that for lack of his hated wife Charlotte of Hesse-Kassel, the bigamy issue and subsequent succession dilemmas would go away. Namely, lets say Charlotte passes away 7 years earlier in 1679. This makes Charles I Louis' second bigamous marriage in OTL (to Elizabeth Hollander Von Bernau) perfectly valid as far as I can tell (why should it matter that he had two wives in the past when neither are alive now?) and as a result his OTL son Charles Louis born in 1681 should be legitimate and therefore succeed his brother as Charles II Louis of the Palatinate in 1685 (as a four year old). Come 1701 and we have Charles II Louis as the now adult Protestant ruler of the Palatinate with a very good claim to the British Throne. He has every likelihood to be chosen for the Act of Settlement (with pressure to get heirs of course.

Speculation on who Charles is likely to marry, how his reign affected the Nine Years War, or the effects of Britain getting a young Wittelsbach ruler instead of the 54 year old George I?

Would'nt the match with Mlle von Bernau be regarded as morganatic? Because unless he's paid the special tax to allow that the marriage is considered equal by the HRE's laws, that son, while having a fairly decent claim to the British throne, has none to that of the Palatinate. I'm sure Parliament will be dancing in the streets for that, although, the only one of Charles' bigamously born children to leave issue, his daughter Karoline Elisabeth (and let's face it, if you want to cleave hairs, Elizabeth I was likewise born bigamously as far as some were concerned), was both married to a naturalized Englishman (Meinhard, duke of Schomberg, their son bore the title of Marquess of Harlech (I think) and had a better claim than the Hannoverians, and yet she was passed over.
 
Morganatic is true then- I hadn't thought of that, so Charles Louis Jr. would probably just be one of the pretenders to the Palatinate throne? And if he has no other domain to rule might he actually be brought up English?
 
One subsequent thought- With a young English speaking monarch in the 1700s is the position of Prime Minister completely butterflied away?
 
Top