WI: Boulanger becomes President of France

In 1883, a French General, Boulanger, came dangerously close to taking over the republic. Operating on a platform oddly reminiscent of fascism (nationalism, pluralism, militarism), he was seen as a perfect solution to republican instability at the time. What if Boulanger had become president, either through election or a coup d'état (his supporters wanted him to take over, but he decided not to do it, and the government used this as an excuse to accuse him of treason, forcing him to flee)? Would we perhaps see an earlier WW1 as he attempted to retake Alsace-Lorraine?
 
In 1883, a French General, Boulanger, came dangerously close to taking over the republic. Operating on a platform oddly reminiscent of fascism (nationalism, pluralism, militarism), he was seen as a perfect solution to republican instability at the time. What if Boulanger had become president, either through election or a coup d'état (his supporters wanted him to take over, but he decided not to do it, and the government used this as an excuse to accuse him of treason, forcing him to flee)? Would we perhaps see an earlier WW1 as he attempted to retake Alsace-Lorraine?

His best bet would be the 27th of January, 1889, actually, when he got elected a Member in Paris and the mob wanted him to march on the Elysee. The gov't basically admitted after the fact that if he had tried to become President-for-Life or the like there was nothing they could have done to stop him. He ended up spending the evening with his mistress, which probably explains a bit about why he wouldn't have been a good dictator. :rolleyes:

A Boulanger Presidency? God knows, although probably a sharp swerve to the right. I don't think he would have started a war with Germany, at least not yet; he was a general and understood France's position without allies was pretty weak. Ironically, as a crazy nationalist he might piss off his potential allies, Britain especially (see, Fashoda).
 

General Zod

Banned
His best bet would be the 27th of January, 1889, actually, when he got elected a Member in Paris and the mob wanted him to march on the Elysee. The gov't basically admitted after the fact that if he had tried to become President-for-Life or the like there was nothing they could have done to stop him.

Exactly. Had he shown some political savy at that moment he would have become dictator of France, a mix of Petain and DeGaulle with a sprinke of a republican Napoleon III two generations in advance.

He ended up spending the evening with his mistress, which probably explains a bit about why he wouldn't have been a good dictator. :rolleyes:

Yep on the long term, having seized power as the incarnation of French revanchist expansionism, he would have ended up just like Napoleon III, crippled his country by leading her to reckless wars and biting more than he could chew. On the brief term, he just needed a bit more common sense on that specific day, a typical PoD.

A Boulanger Presidency? God knows, although probably a sharp swerve to the right.

Yep, like Petain he would have reunified the three wings of the French right, the extreme republicans, the bonapartists and the legitimists under his leadership and built a power base with the Catholics and the Army.

I don't think he would have started a war with Germany, at least not yet; he was a general and understood France's position without allies was pretty weak. Ironically, as a crazy nationalist he might piss off his potential allies, Britain especially (see, Fashoda).

He was not such a good general and was a braggart nationalist, so he would wait until he has solidified the strategic alliance with Russia in the early '90s, rearming and making loud revanchist claims up to then. He will most surely alienate Italy to stay loyal to the Triple Alliance (his Catholic power base will require a popist, anti-Italian stance), and most likely, having a nationalist political agenda, he will take an intransigent stance at incidents like Fashoda. He might cultivate an alliance with Spain, too, on a conservative Latin-Catholic bloc agenda.

Most likely scenario: WWI occurs half a generation in advance, quite probably over Fashoda, and it sees a Franco-Russian-Spanish Entente vs. a British-German-Italian-Austrian Alliance. Turkey a wild card, the USA might join the alliance as the American-Spanish conflict becomes a part of WWI.

That's another TL I hope to write, sooner or later.
 
Franco-Spanish Alliance? The US might have real naval challenge come 1898. They probably wouldn't lose though, just see Boulanger fall and give the left a big boost.

I doubt a more nationalist France would see Britain join the Triple (Quadruple) Alliance, probably just stay totally out of a Continental War.

Boulangeriste France might get dicey over Fashoda but again I doubt war, possible expansion into Southern China? Boulanger might also team up with Balkan nationalists in Rumania and Serbia
 
Top