King himself allied with them eventually, but having a male heir he'd have no reason to do it ITTL.(unfortunately, they succeeded).
King himself allied with them eventually, but having a male heir he'd have no reason to do it ITTL.(unfortunately, they succeeded).
You say most. When did the situation change? I thought that the magnates were always the main antagonists to royal power.Tho that still doesn't match situation of Poland in late XVIth century, as in Poland during reign of Sigismund I and most of reign of Sigismund II top echelons of nobility were allied with the King in preserving their position and King's own personal power against middle nobility (so-called "executionist movement") who wanted to curb the upper nobility and limit King's own personal power (unfortunately, they succeeded).
I wonder when Sigismund II would reconcile the thought that he'd be succeeded by his younger brother. He'd want to avoid deposition, no?King himself allied with them eventually, but having a male heir he'd have no reason to do it ITTL.
Ah damn. And here I thought my TL could be somewhat original.If anybody is interested and can bother to GT Russian text - me and @Rurik did somewhat a big TL on this PoD (developed to mid-17th century as far as genealogies go; the detailed TL is until 1573).
http://fai.org.ru/forum/topic/47843-udachnaya-ohota-taymlayn/ TL
Honorary mention of Mr. @Jan Olbracht as an author of the idea.Удачная охота. Общее обсуждение
Запоздалый подарок ко дню рождения коллеги Рюрика.Развилка до неприличия простая и банальная - "он передумал". В данном случае "он" - дикий кабан, в реале 2...fai.org.ru
And yes, Albert of Poland marries Anne d'Este ITTL. His progeny goes on to inherit d'Este to the exclusion of the (OTL heirs) bastard line, as the last Duke is childless.
Screwed up in the description of the opening (somehow misremembering bear-hunt as boar-hunt despite bear and boar sounding nothing alike in Russian/Belarusian).
King himself allied with them eventually, but having a male heir he'd have no reason to do it ITTL.
I wonder when Sigismund II would reconcile the thought that he'd be succeeded by his younger brother. He'd want to avoid deposition, no?
In turn that'd depend on Albert's overall health. If he was generally healthy as opposed to his father and brother I imagine he would pose a threat to Sigismund's positionWell, it depends on whether he would have liked him personally or not.
Again: could at this point Albert plausibly consolidate royal power?I know that, still doesn't change that things that made PLC most dysfunctional were executionist movement's ideas.
Father? Sigismund the Old had iron health, he lived to impressive age by 15/16th century standards (and fathered his last child at age 60).In turn that'd depend on Albert's overall health. If he was generally healthy as opposed to his father
I thought he suffered gout and rheumatism? Or am I mistakenFather? Sigismund the Old had iron health, he lived to impressive age by 15/16th century standards (and fathered his last child at age 60).
If he was generally healthy as opposed to his father and brother I imagine he would pose a threat to Sigismund's position
Again: could at this point Albert plausibly consolidate royal power?
Then perhaps it's more appropriate to ask what reforms could Albert attempt to bring from Italy?Well, that's very muddied and no one knows.
Then perhaps it's more appropriate to ask what reforms could Albert attempt to bring from Italy?
Then how about codifying succession to primogeniture?Well, it's not from Italy but he could definitely push for House of Envoys being recognized as not equal in the process of law-making to the senate or the King, as Jan Ocieski, one of the most trusted associates of Sigismund II wanted.
Grand Duchy of Lithuania had tradition of heir designation.Then how about codifying succession to primogeniture?
Then how about codifying succession to primogeniture?
It's more doable that seems, as there would be no attempt that caused controversy over vivente rege - as is no precedent of lifetime Sigismund II election, since with healthy younger brother the succession is more secure.Well, that's the most controversial topic, but I believe that limiting election to male descendants of Jagiełło/Jogaila and having tradition of electing the king during previous king lifetime would be semi-doable.
Pretty likelyHaving 2 sons Bona would not pursue Vivente Rege at all costs.
This is what we thought, so later lifetime elections introduction is no big deal.Having 2 sons Bona would not pursue Vivente Rege at all costs.
Is exactly what I thought as well.This is what we thought, so later lifetime elections introduction is no big deal.